Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
auc decrease » a decreased (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
5 point » _ point (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
auc decrease » a decreased (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), c decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
5 point » _ point (Expand Search)
-
1
Diagnostic performance of blood parameters to discriminate abnormal from normal MAD activity (A) and decreased from absent MAD activity (B).
Published 2015“…(B) Classifiers for the differentiation of Absent (n = 5) from Decreased (n = 6) MAD activity. 50% PMP: 50% from predicted maximal power (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132972#sec006" target="_blank">Methods</a>), R: Recovery from exercise, Se: Sensibility, Sp: Specificity, Acc: Accuracy, PPV: Positive predictive value, NPV: Negative predictive value, LR+: Positive likelihood ratio, LR-: Negative likelihood ratio, DOR: Diagnostic odds ratio, NC: Not calculable.…”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
The combination of LPS and PFC caused faster clot initiation and decreased clot strength.
Published 2022“…Comparing groups, there is a significant decline in TEG MA in LPS-PFC3 group compared to LPS-SAL group at T72 and T96 time points (p<0.05). By RM ANOVA, the time effects were obscured by interaction with group: SAL-SAL, p = NS; LPS-SAL, MA increases with time; T0 v T72 and T96, p≤0.05; SAL-PFC: MA drops @ T96, p≤0.05; LPS-PFC: T0 v all others, p≤0.05 with a recovery at T96, (p≤0.05 compared to T72); SAL-PFC: no significant change, p = NS. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20