Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mm decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
_ step » _ stem (Expand Search)
12 mm » 10 mm (Expand Search), 2 mm (Expand Search), 15 mm (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
HRMECs treated with SUZ12 siRNA demonstrate increased miR-200b expression, decreased VEGF expression and decreased endothelial branching.
Published 2015“…[NG+control siRNA = 5mM D-glucose + 100nM control siRNA, HG+control siRNA = 25mM D-glucose + 100nM control siRNA, HG+EZH2 siRNA = 25mM D-glucose + 100nM EZH2 siRNA, HG+SUZ12 siRNA = 25mM + 100nM SUZ12 siRNA; identical letters represent groups that are not significantly different; p < 0.05; n = 6; data expressed as mean ± SEM, normalized to U6 or β-actin and expressed as a fold change of NG+control siRNA].…”
-
3
Decrease of myopia progression with 0.025% atropine
Published 2018“…Myopic progression was significantly lower in group 1 (-0.43 +/- 0.19 D) than in group 2 (-1.24 +/- 0.37 D) and axial length increase was also significantly smaller in group 1(0.19 +/- 0.09 mm) than in group 2 (0.48 +/- 0.12 mm). There were no significant statistical differences regarding keratometry between groups. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Comparison of forward resistance.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
14
Table of step height.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
15
The well wall step.
Published 2024“…Finally, by making corresponding test blocks, it was found that the peak value of forward resistance when the 10.5°test block crossed the steps of 1mm, 2mm and 3mm height decreased by 19.8%, 25.0% and 13.9% respectively, and the mean value decreased by 30.8%, 27.2% and 24.1% respectively, which was close to the simulation results, and verified the accuracy of the finite element analysis results.…”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20