Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
59 a » 19 a (Expand Search), 5 a (Expand Search), 59 0 (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
59 a » 19 a (Expand Search), 5 a (Expand Search), 59 0 (Expand Search)
-
221
-
222
Decreased cell stiffness after dissociation of intercellular adhesion.
Published 2014“…Cell stiffness was measured before and after the nanorobotic surgery and decreases from 30.0±1.5 kPa to 20.5±2.8 kPa, respectively. …”
-
223
-
224
-
225
-
226
-
227
The combination of LPS and PFC caused faster clot initiation and decreased clot strength.
Published 2022“…Comparing groups, there is a significant decline in TEG MA in LPS-PFC3 group compared to LPS-SAL group at T72 and T96 time points (p<0.05). By RM ANOVA, the time effects were obscured by interaction with group: SAL-SAL, p = NS; LPS-SAL, MA increases with time; T0 v T72 and T96, p≤0.05; SAL-PFC: MA drops @ T96, p≤0.05; LPS-PFC: T0 v all others, p≤0.05 with a recovery at T96, (p≤0.05 compared to T72); SAL-PFC: no significant change, p = NS. …”
-
228
-
229
-
230
-
231
-
232
-
233
-
234
-
235
Binding of <i>PC3/Tis21</i> to the <i>Id3</i> promoter and corresponding decrease of <i>Id3</i> mRNA.
Published 2009“…Luciferase activity is represented as mean ± SEM fold increase from four experiments. *, <i>p</i><0.05 vs. the corresponding time point of PC12 cells without exogenous PC3, Student's t test. …”
-
236
-
237
-
238
Average nearest neighbour analysis before and after filtering of data points.
Published 2022Subjects: -
239
The mean and standard deviation of parameters.
Published 2024“…Additionally, one-way ANCOVA revealed a significant difference between the groups post-treatment (F(1,31) = 6.011, P = 0.020, η2 = 0.162) and one month post-treatment (F(1,31) = 4.889, P = 0.035, η2 = 0.136), with ML SI being significantly lower in the exergaming group than the balance training group at both time points. In both group, the DPSI also decreased significantly one month post-treatment compared to before and after treatment (P = 0.040 and P = 0.018, respectively). …”
-
240