Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and . by Selim Haj Ali (21222613)

“…<p>For 50 Erdős-Rényi graphs with 30 nodes and 70 edges, we split the results into two columns according to the two initial degenerate unstable eigenmodes  +  : on the left, (if ), and on the right, (if ). …”

Means and standard deviations of the age of mothers, fathers, and children across the seven waves. by Chiara Remondi (15301459)

Randomization scheme for a “2 × 2 × 2 factorial plus 1 (controls)” design trial, generating 9 arms. by Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard (7377500)

A brief illustration of the revisions between AJCC TNM eighth and ninth editions. by Aihong Zheng (20571034)

Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI. by Aneta Teległów (9570190)

Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure? by Roberto Novella-Fernandez (8119745)

Mean contacts by risk perception or risk category by adult age groups of 18 to 59 and 60 or more years with 95% CI of bootstrapped mean weighted by age, gender, and weekday. by Amy Gimma (8809463)

Relationship between pattern electroretinogram and optic disc morphology in glaucoma by Soo Ji Jeon (3364214)

“…However, in glaucoma patients, mean RNFL thickness was associated with PERG amplitude (<i>P =</i> 0.011 for P50 and 0.002 for N95).…”

Mean scores and 95% CIs according to SARS-CoV-2 infection status and work-related determinants. by A. H. Ayesha Lavell (16734002)

S1 File - by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Detailed information on field experiments. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

List of symbols used in this study. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Data sources for calibration and evaluation. by Yonghui Zhang (279832)

“…The CSPM, driven by the optimized CSPs, is then evaluated against two independent phenological datasets from Exp. 2 and Exp. 4 described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0302098#pone.0302098.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>. Root means square error (RMSE) (mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and Nash Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE)) are 15.50 (14.63, 0.96, 0.42), 4.76 (3.92, 0.97, 0.95), 4.69 (3.72, 0.98, 0.95), 3.91 (3.40, 0.99, 0.96) and 12.54 (11.67, 0.95, 0.60), 5.07 (4.61, 0.98, 0.93), 4.97 (4.28, 0.97, 0.94), 4.58 (4.02, 0.98, 0.95) for using one, two, three, and four observed phenological stages in the CSPs estimation. …”

Area estimates in CAKR by percentage of the mean LSR of the 3000–4000 m distance class (41.9) according to the posterior predictions model. by Peter N. Neitlich (4034300)

Subjects:

<i>Drosophila CG8501</i>, an orthologous gene of human <i>CD59</i>. by Sang-Ho Yoon (10123698)

“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Schematic illustration of the orthologous gene selection process. …”

Decreased levels of cathepsin Z mRNA expressed by immune blood cells: diagnostic and prognostic implications in prostate cancer by A.A.S. Batista (12656058)

<i>Drosophila CG8501</i>, an orthologous gene of human <i>CD59</i>. by Sang-Ho Yoon (10123698)

“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Expression of CD orthologues in <i>Drosophila</i> hemocytes. …”

Scatterplots showing the relationship between anteversion angle (AVA) and mean joint contact forces during the stance phase, and neck-shaft angle (NSA) and mean joint contact force... by Hans Kainz (8459514)

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of immediate antiretroviral therapy initiation for treatment of HIV infection in Côte d’Ivoire: A model-based analysis by Eric N. Ouattara (6890174)

Mean (±95%CI) Rating of perceived exertion measured using a numeric scale (1–10) for the Nordic hamstring exercise, Sprint and control groups. by Nicholas J. Ripley (14709756)