Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
6 1 » 6 10 (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
1 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
6 1 » 6 10 (Expand Search)
-
21
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…Histograms show the mean firing rate for the corresponding neuron along each segment of the virtual track. (B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
22
-
23
-
24
rVλ6Wil fibrils cause a decrease in cardiomyocytes MTT reduction without inducing cell death.
Published 2015“…(C) Cell number, quantified using crystal violet (black) did not decrease over 72 h of incubation with 1 μM rVλ6Wil fibrils despite a decrease in MMT reduction (grey; n = 3 samples per time point). …”
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
FUD transiently decreased IOP in mice injected with Ad5-TGFβ2 viral vector.
Published 2020“…(B) IOPs were monitored for 5 more days (until Day 22) in a subset of mice from A. …”
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40
<i>prx-5/6</i> mutations likely cause a decrease in mmBCFA degradation.
Published 2013“…<i>elo-5</i>(<i>lf</i>)<i>; Ex</i>[<i>elo-6</i>] is a transgenic strain that significantly overexpressed the <i>elo-6</i> gene and was not sufficient to suppress the L1 arrest phenotype of <i>elo-5</i>(<i>lf</i>). …”