Search alternatives:
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
6 points » _ points (Expand Search), 3 points (Expand Search), 5 points (Expand Search)
points decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), point increase (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
6 points » _ points (Expand Search), 3 points (Expand Search), 5 points (Expand Search)
-
1261
-
1262
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1263
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1264
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1265
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
1266
-
1267
Nilotinib decreases HEI-193 cell viability in a time-, dose-, and growth condition- dependent manner.
Published 2013“…(B) HEI-193 grown in PDGF media were treated with 0, 3, 5, 10 or 20 µM nilotinib up to 5 days. Trypan blue viability assay shows decreased number of viable cells at 5 days in 3 µM nilotinib, compared to vehicle shown, mean and SD of six technical replicates. …”
-
1268
-
1269
-
1270
-
1271
Decreased dermal and corneal stromal collagen in <i>Slc39a13</i>-KO mice.
Published 2008“…Data represent mean±S.D. F. Collagen of corneal stroma is decreased in <i>Slc39a13</i>-KO mice. …”
-
1272
-
1273
Individual data and box plots on ∑PBB of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>Individual data (A) indicate an increase in the early 1980’s, a peak in mid-late 1990’s followed by a decrease depending on study area. …”
-
1274
-
1275
Individual data and box plots on ∑TEQs of all samples.
Published 2024“…<p>Individual data show decreasing temporal trends that depend on study area until 2010 (A). …”
-
1276
Blocking TNF or IL-6 decreases HIV-1 replication significantly in a dose dependent manner.
Published 2013“…Blocking TNF (at 2 ug/ml or 5 ug/ml) or IL-6 (5 ug/ml) significantly decreased virus replication (*, p<0.05) as compared to the same concentrations of an IgG<sub>1</sub> control antibody. …”
-
1277
-
1278
-
1279
-
1280