Search alternatives:
points decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
points decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
12
-
13
TITAN thresholds and percentile estimates for benthic macroinvertebrate and diatom communities deemed to be sensitive decreasers or tolerant increasers. The thresholds represent the largest fsum <i>z</i> value in the main data analysis run (i.e., the median), whereas the 5<sup>th</sup> and 95<sup>th</sup> percentile change points are determined from 500 bootstrap replicate runs. Sensitive taxa change points derived from decreaser sum <i>z</i>- relative to increasing impervious cover (I.C.; %), specific conductivity (SpCond; μS cm<sup>-1</sup>), total nitrogen (TN; μg L<sup>-1</sup>), and total phosphorus (TP; μg L<sup>-1</sup>). Tolerant taxa change point derived from increaser sum <i>z</i>+ value. Flow permanence responses are opposite those of other stressors such that increasers are sensitive to decreasing FPI....
Published 2025“…Tolerant taxa change point derived from increaser sum <i>z</i>+ value. Flow permanence responses are opposite those of other stressors such that increasers are sensitive to decreasing FPI. …”
-
14
-
15
Scatterplots of IOP at different time points.
Published 2024“…After surgery, the mean intraocular pressure decreased from 19.23 ± 4.33 to 14.52 ± 3.79 mmHg, which constituted a 36.7 ± 7.8% reduction compared to the baseline value. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20