Search alternatives:
classification model » classification _ (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
classification model » classification _ (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Classification model parameter settings.
Published 2025“…Experiments demonstrate that PCA-CGAN not only achieves stable convergence on a large-scale heterogeneous dataset comprising 43 patients for the first time but also resolves the “dilution effect” problem in data augmentation, avoiding the asymmetric phenomenon where Precision increases while Recall decreases. After data augmentation, the ResNet model’s average F1 score improved significantly, with particularly outstanding performance on rare categories such as atrial premature beats, far surpassing traditional methods like SigCWGAN and TD-GAN. …”
-
3
-
4
Accuracies of the classification models.
Published 2019“…<p>Accuracies of the classification models.</p>…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Classification results of models.
Published 2024“…Firstly, hyperspectral images of seven varieties of soybean, H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 and H7, were collected by hyperspectral imager, and by using the principle of the three base colours, the R, G and B bands which have more characteristic information are selected to reconstruct the images with different texture and colour characteristics to generate a new dataset for seed segmentation, and finally, a comparison is made with the classification effect of the seven models. The experimental results in ResNet34 show that the classification accuracy of the dataset before and after RGB reconstruction increases from 88.87% to 91.75%, demonstrating that RGB image reconstruction can strengthen image features; ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, CBAM-ResNet34, SENet-ResNet34, and SENet-ResNet34-DCN models have classification accuracies of 72.25%, 91.75%, 89%, 88.48%, 92.28%, 92.80%, and 94.24%, respectively.SENet-ResNet34-DCN achieves the greatest classification accuracy results, with a model loss of roughly 0.3. …”
-
9
The details of the classification models.
Published 2019“…<p>The details of the classification models.</p>…”
-
10
Comparison of classification models.
Published 2019“…<p>(A) Classification models outperform all individual features for use in classification of gene expression. …”
-
11
Classification results of models.
Published 2024“…Firstly, hyperspectral images of seven varieties of soybean, H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 and H7, were collected by hyperspectral imager, and by using the principle of the three base colours, the R, G and B bands which have more characteristic information are selected to reconstruct the images with different texture and colour characteristics to generate a new dataset for seed segmentation, and finally, a comparison is made with the classification effect of the seven models. The experimental results in ResNet34 show that the classification accuracy of the dataset before and after RGB reconstruction increases from 88.87% to 91.75%, demonstrating that RGB image reconstruction can strengthen image features; ResNet18, ResNet34, ResNet50, ResNet101, CBAM-ResNet34, SENet-ResNet34, and SENet-ResNet34-DCN models have classification accuracies of 72.25%, 91.75%, 89%, 88.48%, 92.28%, 92.80%, and 94.24%, respectively.SENet-ResNet34-DCN achieves the greatest classification accuracy results, with a model loss of roughly 0.3. …”
-
12
-
13
Comparison of Model Five-classification Results.
Published 2025“…Experiments demonstrate that PCA-CGAN not only achieves stable convergence on a large-scale heterogeneous dataset comprising 43 patients for the first time but also resolves the “dilution effect” problem in data augmentation, avoiding the asymmetric phenomenon where Precision increases while Recall decreases. After data augmentation, the ResNet model’s average F1 score improved significantly, with particularly outstanding performance on rare categories such as atrial premature beats, far surpassing traditional methods like SigCWGAN and TD-GAN. …”
-
14
The classification reports for experiments with tweet-level classification models.
Published 2023“…<p>The classification reports for experiments with tweet-level classification models.…”
-
15
Probability of correct classification for classification models with different SNRs.
Published 2024Subjects: -
16
The classification of model variables.
Published 2021“…<p>The classification of model variables.</p>…”
-
17
-
18
Evaluation of classification model.
Published 2023“…The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on imbalanced datasets.…”
-
19
-
20
Issue Classification Model
Published 2025“…<p dir="ltr"><b>Cross-platform Election Advertising Transparency Initiative (CREATIVE):</b> issue classification model that predicts which political issues (e.g., taxes, crime, abortion, etc.; out of 65 potential issue categories) are mentioned in ad. …”