Showing 1 - 20 results of 88,720 for search '(( _ non decrease ) OR ((( 50 ((ms decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( 10 we decrease ))))', query time: 0.77s Refine Results
  1. 1

    SLE decreases risk for hormonal cancers. by Deborah K. Johnson (10001156)

    Published 2021
    “…An OR to the left of the solid line represents a reduction in risk. (a) Breast cancer incidence in female SLE cohort is significantly decreased by SLE status (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35, 0.74, p = 0.0036). …”
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness. by Gui Araujo (22170819)

    Published 2025
    “…(C) Mutualism also promotes an increase in network connectance when introduced into assembled communities, while stopping mutualistic interactions from entering an assembled system slowly decreases it. (D) As a result, the introduction of mutualistic interactions promotes a growth in complexity in communities where it was once established as low, while stopping the introduction of further mutualistic interactions causes a slight decrease in complexity. …”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    DART-ID decreases missing datapoints across runs. by Albert Tian Chen (6900215)

    Published 2019
    “…Only peptides seen in >50% of experiments are included. (<b>b</b>) Decrease in missing data across all runs after applying DART-ID, for SCoPE-MS and the two bulk sets from <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007082#pcbi.1007082.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a> at 1% FDR. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Downregulation of DOM decreases the abundance of PER and TIM. by Zhenxing Liu (399809)

    Published 2019
    “…Downregulation of DOM decreased PER levels at CT1-5 and CT17-21. (Scale bar: 50 um.) …”
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and . by Selim Haj Ali (21222613)

    Published 2025
    “…(a) and (b): Average negative predictive value for and , respectively for and . …”
  19. 19
  20. 20