Search alternatives:
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
system decrease » step decrease (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
_ system » _ systems (Expand Search), _ systemic (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
system decrease » step decrease (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
_ system » _ systems (Expand Search), _ systemic (Expand Search)
-
1
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…(C) Mutualism also promotes an increase in network connectance when introduced into assembled communities, while stopping mutualistic interactions from entering an assembled system slowly decreases it. (D) As a result, the introduction of mutualistic interactions promotes a growth in complexity in communities where it was once established as low, while stopping the introduction of further mutualistic interactions causes a slight decrease in complexity. …”
-
2
-
3
(A) Network map of the top ten anti-AD core targets and the top 30 KEGG pathways. The color of the pathway nodes changed from pink to light pink as the DC value decreased. (B) 19 core pathways with DC values (ranked by DC> average value of (4.933)).
Published 2025“…The color of the pathway nodes changed from pink to light pink as the DC value decreased. (B) 19 core pathways with DC values (ranked by DC> average value of (4.933)).…”
-
4
-
5
Loss of ECRG4 expression decreases neutrophil mobilization from bone marrow reserves.
Published 2024Subjects: -
6
Predicting pattern diversity decreases as a function of and .
Published 2025“…(a) and (b): Average negative predictive value for and , respectively for and . (b) and (d): Average proportion of cases predicted as pattern diversity decreases for and , respectively for and .…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…And if the value of λ assumes larger values, the distortion in the shape of the transmitted wave is associated with the plastic deformation in the uncoupled rock mass. …”
-
14
-
15
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”
-
19
-
20