Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
-
10421
Image_4_Functional Plasticity of Gamma Delta T Cells and Breast Tumor Targets in Hypoxia.tiff
Published 2018“…Mechanistically, we determined that natural killer group 2, member D (NKG2D) on γδTc and the NKG2D ligand MHC class I polypeptide-related sequence A (MICA)/B on MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cell lines are important for γδTc cytotoxicity, but that MIP1α, RANTES, and CD40L do not play a direct role in cytotoxicity. …”
-
10422
-
10423
-
10424
-
10425
-
10426
-
10427
-
10428
-
10429
The effects of losartan on cytomegalovirus infection in human trabecular meshwork cells - Fig 3
Published 2019Subjects: -
10430
-
10431
-
10432
The effects of losartan on cytomegalovirus infection in human trabecular meshwork cells
Published 2019Subjects: -
10433
-
10434
-
10435
-
10436
-
10437
The effects of losartan on cytomegalovirus infection in human trabecular meshwork cells - Fig 2
Published 2019Subjects: -
10438
-
10439
The effects of losartan on cytomegalovirus infection in human trabecular meshwork cells - Fig 4
Published 2019Subjects: -
10440
AS TR2-UBE3A mice had significant improvements in the Morris water maze.
Published 2013“…The only significant differences seen were an increase in latency for the AS TR2-GFP mice on day 3 and a decrease in latency for wildtype mice on day 4 compared to the other two groups (2-way ANOVA Bonferroni: Interaction [F(8,100) = 1.01, <i>P>0.05</i>]; Treatment [F(2,100) = 5.30, <i>P<0.05</i>]; Time [F(4,100) = 53.49, <i>P<0.0001</i>]; Matching [F(25,100) = 5.37, <i>P<0.0001</i>]). …”