Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i larvae (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i larvae (Expand Search)
-
481
-
482
-
483
-
484
S1 Data -
Published 2023“…Data were drawn from seven waves of the Parenting Across Cultures (PAC) project, a large-scale longitudinal, cross-cultural study, and included 200 Italian children (<i>M</i><sub>AgeAtTime1</sub> = 9.80, <i>SD</i> = 0.65; 50.5% girls) and their parents (200 mothers; 190 fathers). …”
-
485
-
486
-
487
-
488
-
489
-
490
Linking gene of interest to hygromycin expression cassette lowers overall expression.
Published 2023Subjects: -
491
-
492
-
493
-
494
-
495
-
496
-
497
-
498
Summary plots of P300 peak amplitude and latency means for averaged ERPs: larger and faster responses for most salient stimuli.
Published 2014“…<p>Top: A, B, C, E - mean peak amplitudes for A. Color/Luminance (exp I); B. …”
-
499
Distribution of plasmid profiles (with decreasing order of large plasmid) and incompatibility types in <i>S</i>....
Published 2018“…<p>Distribution of plasmid profiles (with decreasing order of large plasmid) and incompatibility types in <i>S</i>. …”
-
500
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”