Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T‑Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation by Aaqib H. Khan (9407159)

“…The rate of microbubble production was found to increase from 180 microbubbles/s in the absence of ultrasound to (6.5 ± 1.2) × 10⁶ bubble/s in the presence of ultrasound (100% ultrasound amplitude). When stored in a closed environment, the microbubbles were observed to be stable for up to 30 days, with the concentration of the microbubble suspension decreasing from ∼2.81 × 10⁹/mL to ∼2.3 × 10⁶/mL and the size changing from 1.73 ± 0.2 to 1.45 ± 0.3 μm at the end of 30 days. …”

Agricultural field path planning diagram. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

Schematic diagram of AIC operation. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

Partial field data of Huaxing Farm. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

Beluga Whale Optimization algorithm flow chart. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

Different operating angles θ = 90°, θ = 180°. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

Farm land preparation operation scheduling plan. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

NSGA-III algorithm flow chart. by Manxian Yang (20521600)

“…For single-field operations, a path planning approach is developed that minimizes energy consumption. …”

The spectrum and distribution of germline <i>FLCN</i> pathogenic variants identified in the probands (N = 297) on the genomic structure of <i>FLCN</i>. by Yukiko Namba (6829589)

A survey to determine effects of human interference on grassland and disturbed area herbaceous plants, vertebrates and invertebrates at York University by Justin Kim (3117231)

“…Abundance of woody plants were counted every 2m within 0.5m of the transect. Only plants larger than 1.5m in height were counted. Having a height requirement decreased the probability of counting a non-woody plant. …”

Traub-Miles model with slow M current. by Lukas Ramlow (11349500)

Spatial and spatial frequency joint entropy as a function of Michelson contrast for seven different subjects (circles) and for the “average subject” (crosses). by Vladímir de Aquino Silveira (513285)

“…The dashed line represents the theoretical minimum for the 1D joint entropy of a system comprising only linear interactions between its subsystems, 0.0796. …”