Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
laser decrease » water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), asdr decreased (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
laser decrease » water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), asdr decreased (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
-
1944
-
1945
-
1946
-
1947
-
1948
-
1949
-
1950
-
1951
-
1952
-
1953
-
1954
-
1955
-
1956
-
1957
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1958
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1959
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1960
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”