Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
i largest » _ largest (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search)
-
2281
-
2282
-
2283
-
2284
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2285
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2286
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2287
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2288
-
2289
-
2290
-
2291
-
2292
-
2293
-
2294
-
2295
Association between the sum of health behaviors and decrease in physical health from before to during the pandemic....
Published 2025“…<p>Association between the sum of health behaviors and decrease in physical health from before to during the pandemic. …”
-
2296
Housing conditions specifically impaired long-term SRM (mean±SEM): A) Rats in group housing displayed a significant decrease in SIT during the second 5 min encounter (A2, empty bars) compared to the first (A1, gray bars), regardless of the time interval between the encounters.
Published 2013“…B) Socially isolated rats displayed a significant decrease in SIT measured during the second encounter only for intervals of 30 and 60 min but not for a 120 min interval. …”
-
2297
Decreased Memory B Cells and Increased CD8 Memory T Cells in Blood of Breastfed Children: The Generation R Study
Published 2015“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Per month continuation of breastfeeding, a 3% (95% CI -6, -1) decrease in CD27+IgM+, a 2% (95 CI % -5, -1) decrease in CD27+IgA+ and a 2% (95% CI -4, -1) decrease in CD27-IgG+ memory B cell numbers were observed at 6 months of age. …”
-
2298
-
2299
-
2300
High DHA intake modulates the fatty acid profile of the frontal cortex of NonTg and 3xTg-AD mice and decreases soluble <i>p</i>tau.
Published 2011“…Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA and correlations were analyzed using a linear regression. …”