Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
-
18321
-
18322
-
18323
-
18324
-
18325
-
18326
-
18327
-
18328
-
18329
-
18330
-
18331
-
18332
-
18333
-
18334
-
18335
-
18336
CONSORT flow diagram of the study.
Published 2023“…Compared to the control group, the intervention group had a lower C-Section (CS) rate (p = 0.03).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Tele-midwifery intervention reduced FOC, increased women’s self-efficacy in childbirth, and decreased the number of CS in a group of first-time mothers. …”
-
18337
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
18338
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
18339
Characteristics of the participants.
Published 2023“…Compared to the control group, the intervention group had a lower C-Section (CS) rate (p = 0.03).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Tele-midwifery intervention reduced FOC, increased women’s self-efficacy in childbirth, and decreased the number of CS in a group of first-time mothers. …”
-
18340