Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
-
17981
Predictors of self-stigma scores longitudinally.
Published 2024“…Decreases in total self-stigma scores over 12 months predicted diabetes outcomes at 12 months (HbA1c, total effect; B = 0.070 95%CI: 0.0032, 0.14; <i>P</i> < .05), however depressive symptoms did not mediate this relationship (average direct effect; B = 0.064; 95% CI: -0.0043, 0.13, <i>P</i> = .069). …”
-
17982
Dataset.
Published 2023“…The estimated proportion of women who were retested among those initially negative in pregnancy fell markedly in April 2020 (39% reduction (32–45%), p<0.001) and the subsequent increase was much slower, only reaching 39% by September 2021 compared to average 53% pre-pandemic. The mean estimated proportion of pregnant women with HIV on ART was unchanged at programme-level (98% vs 98%, p = 0.26), but decreased at population-level (86% vs 80%, p = 0.049). …”
-
17983
Definition of indicators.
Published 2023“…The estimated proportion of women who were retested among those initially negative in pregnancy fell markedly in April 2020 (39% reduction (32–45%), p<0.001) and the subsequent increase was much slower, only reaching 39% by September 2021 compared to average 53% pre-pandemic. The mean estimated proportion of pregnant women with HIV on ART was unchanged at programme-level (98% vs 98%, p = 0.26), but decreased at population-level (86% vs 80%, p = 0.049). …”
-
17984
Cascades of care over time.
Published 2023“…The estimated proportion of women who were retested among those initially negative in pregnancy fell markedly in April 2020 (39% reduction (32–45%), p<0.001) and the subsequent increase was much slower, only reaching 39% by September 2021 compared to average 53% pre-pandemic. The mean estimated proportion of pregnant women with HIV on ART was unchanged at programme-level (98% vs 98%, p = 0.26), but decreased at population-level (86% vs 80%, p = 0.049). …”
-
17985
Spatial variability in the icthyoplankton structure of a subtropicalhypersaline lagoon
Published 2021“…Ichtyoplankton samples were collected monthly from January 2010 to March 2011 at eight sites in Araruama Lagoon by means of a WP2 plankton net equipped with a flowmeter. …”
-
17986
-
17987
-
17988
-
17989
MFS in control, DREADD+CNO and DREADD+CNO+NDR2 groups.
Published 2023“…<p>A, Representative pictures of MFS in the CA3 and DG regions; B, MFS of CA3 region in DREADD+CNO group(n = 6) was distinctly decreased in comparison with that in control group (n = 4, Mann-Whitney test); C, MFS of CA3 and DG were similar in DREADD rats treated with 1,5 and10 mg/kg CNO(n = 4,6 and 6 respectively, Kruskal-Wallis test); D, MFS of CA3 region in DREADD+CNO+NDR2 group(n = 5) was distinctly increased in comparison with that in DREADD+CNO group (Mann-Whitney test). …”
-
17990
-
17991
-
17992
Search strategy.
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17993
Fig 1 -
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17994
GMT by age cohort for PWH and PWoH.
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17995
Fig 4 -
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17996
Difference in GMT for HPV16 and HPV18 in PWH.
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17997
Fig 3 -
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17998
Summary of characteristics of studies reviewed.
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
17999
Cumulative meta-analysis.
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”
-
18000
Summary of immunogenicity information.
Published 2024“…Efficacy was reviewed as cervical/anal/oral lesions or neoplasia, and incident or persistent HPV infection following vaccination. A random effects meta-analysis was performed comparing geometric mean titer (GMT) in PWH to PWoH. …”