Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
-
34441
-
34442
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34443
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34444
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34445
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34446
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34447
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34448
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34449
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
34450
Metronidazole-treated <i>Tg(Inta11:NTR)</i> larvae show defects in median fin fold mesenchyme migration, a reduction in median and pectoral fin fold size and a reduction in endoske...
Published 2018“…Inta11: NTR + MTZ larvae show a decrease in pectoral fin fold area at 72hpf, and 7dpf, as well as a reduction in endoskeletal disc size at 7dpf (J). …”
-
34451
Supplementary Material for: Participant characteristics associated with changes in mental health in a trial of behavioural weight management programmes: Secondary analysis of the W...
Published 2022“…Measurement of depression and anxiety at the start of a behavioural weight management programme and subsequent monitoring may facilitate timely psychological support if a deterioration in mental health is identified. …”
-
34452
A histidine-kinase <i>cheA</i> gene of <i>Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligens</i> KF707 not only has a key role in chemotaxis but also affects biofilm formation and cell metabolism
Published 2011“…Notably, ≥95% decrease in the number of cells attached to the polystyrene surface was observed in <i>cheA</i> mutants compared to the KF707 wild-type biofilm phenotype. …”
-
34453
Characterization, Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of PM2.5 for a Rural Classroom in the Amazon: A Case Study
Published 2021“…<div><p>Classrooms are microenvironments in which children and teenagers may be exposed to fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Iranduba is a rural city in the Amazon region close to many brick kilns and road with high traffic levels. …”
-
34454
Do children and adolescents who consume ultra-processed foods have a worse lipid profile? A systematic review
Published 2021“…After screening, 14 studies were included, of which nine demonstrated that ultra-processed food consumption was related to increased LDL-c, total cholesterol, triglycerides and a reduction in HDL-c. Three studies found no relationship and two demonstrated that the increased intake of ready-to-eat cereals was related to the decrease in total cholesterol and LDL-c. …”
-
34455
-
34456
-
34457
OPJ: Origin data for Fig 9a.
Published 2024“…<div><p>In hot dry regions, photovoltaic modules are exposed to excessive temperatures, which leads to a drop in performance and the risk of overheating. …”
-
34458
OPJ: Origin data for Fig 7a.
Published 2024“…<div><p>In hot dry regions, photovoltaic modules are exposed to excessive temperatures, which leads to a drop in performance and the risk of overheating. …”
-
34459
OPJ: Origin data for Fig 3a.
Published 2024“…<div><p>In hot dry regions, photovoltaic modules are exposed to excessive temperatures, which leads to a drop in performance and the risk of overheating. …”
-
34460
A Regulatory Network for Coordinated Flower Maturation
Published 2012“…The Arabidopsis transcription factors AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR 6 (ARF6) and ARF8 regulate this complex process by promoting petal expansion, stamen filament elongation, anther dehiscence, and gynoecium maturation, thereby ensuring that pollen released from the anthers is deposited on the stigma of a receptive gynoecium. ARF6 and ARF8 induce jasmonate production, which in turn triggers expression of <em>MYB21</em> and <em>MYB24</em>, encoding R2R3 MYB transcription factors that promote petal and stamen growth. …”