Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
a largest » _ largest (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), a latest (Expand Search)
-
381
-
382
-
383
-
384
-
385
Panel (a) shows ensemble mean global mean near-surface air temperature in historical and RCP simulations from CanESM2
Published 2013“…<p><strong>Figure 2.</strong> Panel (a) shows ensemble mean global mean near-surface air temperature in historical and RCP simulations from CanESM2. …”
-
386
-
387
-
388
-
389
-
390
Studies exploring a relationship between <i>Shigella</i> infection and decreased linear growth/stunting or growth measures in young children and other relevant outcomes.
Published 2023“…<p>Studies exploring a relationship between <i>Shigella</i> infection and decreased linear growth/stunting or growth measures in young children and other relevant outcomes.…”
-
391
-
392
Expected changes in mean fecundity with climate change (for a predicted 2.58°C increase in SST at the end of the century under a high emissions scenario; [49]).
Published 2023“…<p>(<b>a</b>) Expected changes in the mean number of eggs across latitudes for different female sizes. …”
-
393
-
394
MHR impairs TEER in Brain endothelial cells and increases transcellular permeability towards high molecular mass molecules.
Published 2013“…MHR no inhibitor 0.77 <u>+</u> 0.02, P < 0.0001; n = 169 - 288 TEER measurements from 3 experiments). DPI prevented the decrease of TEER significantly (MHR+DPI 0.98 <u>+</u> 0.01 vs. …”
-
395
-
396
Dual-task costs (as a percentage decrease in performance compared to single-task performance) (mean ± standard error of the mean), * <i>p</i> < .05, ** <i>p</i> < .01.
Published 2016“…<p>Dual-task costs (as a percentage decrease in performance compared to single-task performance) (mean ± standard error of the mean), * <i>p</i> < .05, ** <i>p</i> < .01.…”
-
397
-
398
-
399
-
400