Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i larvae (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
i large » _ large (Expand Search), a large (Expand Search), i larvae (Expand Search)
-
33921
Table_2_Add-on effect of the Guizhi Fuling formula for management of reduced fertility potential in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of r...
Published 2023“…Adjuvant treatment with the GZFL formula also significantly decreased the serum FSH (mean difference [MD] -0.48 U/l; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.15), total testosterone (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.07; 95% CI -1.71 to -0.44), LH level (MD -2.19 U/l; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.34), and HOMA-IR (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34). …”
-
33922
Table_5_Add-on effect of the Guizhi Fuling formula for management of reduced fertility potential in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of r...
Published 2023“…Adjuvant treatment with the GZFL formula also significantly decreased the serum FSH (mean difference [MD] -0.48 U/l; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.15), total testosterone (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.07; 95% CI -1.71 to -0.44), LH level (MD -2.19 U/l; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.34), and HOMA-IR (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34). …”
-
33923
Table_3_Add-on effect of the Guizhi Fuling formula for management of reduced fertility potential in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of r...
Published 2023“…Adjuvant treatment with the GZFL formula also significantly decreased the serum FSH (mean difference [MD] -0.48 U/l; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.15), total testosterone (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.07; 95% CI -1.71 to -0.44), LH level (MD -2.19 U/l; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.34), and HOMA-IR (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34). …”
-
33924
-
33925
-
33926
Table_1_Add-on effect of the Guizhi Fuling formula for management of reduced fertility potential in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of r...
Published 2023“…Adjuvant treatment with the GZFL formula also significantly decreased the serum FSH (mean difference [MD] -0.48 U/l; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.15), total testosterone (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.07; 95% CI -1.71 to -0.44), LH level (MD -2.19 U/l; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.34), and HOMA-IR (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34). …”
-
33927
Table_4_Add-on effect of the Guizhi Fuling formula for management of reduced fertility potential in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of r...
Published 2023“…Adjuvant treatment with the GZFL formula also significantly decreased the serum FSH (mean difference [MD] -0.48 U/l; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.15), total testosterone (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.07; 95% CI -1.71 to -0.44), LH level (MD -2.19 U/l; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.34), and HOMA-IR (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34). …”
-
33928
Table_6_Add-on effect of the Guizhi Fuling formula for management of reduced fertility potential in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of r...
Published 2023“…Adjuvant treatment with the GZFL formula also significantly decreased the serum FSH (mean difference [MD] -0.48 U/l; 95% CI -0.80 to -0.15), total testosterone (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.07; 95% CI -1.71 to -0.44), LH level (MD -2.19 U/l; 95% CI -3.04 to -1.34), and HOMA-IR (MD -0.47; 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34). …”
-
33929
Table_1_Effect of an inactivated coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine, CoronaVac, on blood coagulation and glucose: a randomized, controlled, open-label phase IV clinical trial.docx
Published 2023“…However, the D-dimer in the CoronaVac group decreased on day 14 compared to the value at baseline, while a higher D-dimer value, instead of a decreased D-dimer value, was a risk factor for TTS.…”
-
33930
Comparisons of [<sup>11</sup>C](+)3-MPB BP<sub>ND</sub> and [<sup>11</sup>C]MP4A index among control, CFS(−) and CFS(+) groups.
Published 2013“…</p><p>Reduction (%) reflects the extent of decreased in the rates of [<sup>11</sup>C](+)3-MPB BP<sub>ND</sub> or [<sup>11</sup>C]MP4A index from control to CFS(+).…”
-
33931
Top 20 Predicted Regulatory Targets of <i>Nkx2-1</i> Identified from a Consensus among Expression based Prediction, ChIP-seq, and Literature Evidence.
Published 2015“…“ChIP-seq” is based on the result of previous <i>Nkx2-1</i> ChIP-seq experiment: 1-represents the target has at least one predicted peak region; 0-means no predicted peak. “Literature Evidence 1” and “Literature Evidence 2” encodes the literature support from Ingenuity IPA (<a href="http://www.ingenuity.com/products/ipa" target="_blank">http://www.ingenuity.com/products/ipa</a>) and Genomatix (<a href="https://www.genomatix.de/" target="_blank">https://www.genomatix.de</a>), respectively. …”
-
33932
-
33933
Table_1_Plant Functional Traits Are the Mediators in Regulating Effects of Abiotic Site Conditions on Aboveground Carbon Stock-Evidence From a 30 ha Tropical Forest Plot.docx
Published 2019“…We measured specific leaf area and wood density of 270 woody plant species and estimated stand AGC stocks in a 30-ha forest plot. The relationships among environmental factors (ENVIRONMENT), community-weighted means of functional traits (TRAITS) and stand AGC stocks across nested spatial scales were disentangled by structural equation modeling. …”
-
33934
Ratio of the number of pairs of images above the bend to the number of pairs of images below the bend in NV’s correlation dimension plot as a function of binned time difference plo...
Published 2014“…<p>The ratio is approximately 1 for a time difference bin of 21 to 34 mins which lies in the range of median and mean context durations (see text for details). …”
-
33935
-
33936
Data_Sheet_1_Soil pqqC-harboring bacterial community response to increasing aridity in semi-arid grassland ecosystems: Diversity, co-occurrence network, and assembly process.docx
Published 2022“…The results showed that the α-diversity of the pqqC community first increased and then decreased with increasing aridity in the natural grassland, while it linearly increased as aridity increased in the disturbed grassland. …”
-
33937
Qualitative changes in the implant subgroup.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the average preoperative IOP was 13.6 mmHg (±4.1, n = 13). The average postoperative IOP on the first day, one, two, and three weeks, and one month after surgery decreased to 8.8 mmHg (±3.3, n = 13), 9.8 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), 10.3 mmHg (±3.6, n = 13), 10.2 mmHg (±2.6, n = 13), and 9.7 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), respectively. …”
-
33938
Results of the colorimetric MTT test.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the average preoperative IOP was 13.6 mmHg (±4.1, n = 13). The average postoperative IOP on the first day, one, two, and three weeks, and one month after surgery decreased to 8.8 mmHg (±3.3, n = 13), 9.8 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), 10.3 mmHg (±3.6, n = 13), 10.2 mmHg (±2.6, n = 13), and 9.7 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), respectively. …”
-
33939
IOP fluctuation.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the average preoperative IOP was 13.6 mmHg (±4.1, n = 13). The average postoperative IOP on the first day, one, two, and three weeks, and one month after surgery decreased to 8.8 mmHg (±3.3, n = 13), 9.8 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), 10.3 mmHg (±3.6, n = 13), 10.2 mmHg (±2.6, n = 13), and 9.7 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), respectively. …”
-
33940
IOP fluctuation.
Published 2025“…In the study group, the average preoperative IOP was 13.6 mmHg (±4.1, n = 13). The average postoperative IOP on the first day, one, two, and three weeks, and one month after surgery decreased to 8.8 mmHg (±3.3, n = 13), 9.8 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), 10.3 mmHg (±3.6, n = 13), 10.2 mmHg (±2.6, n = 13), and 9.7 mmHg (±2.0, n = 13), respectively. …”