Showing 401 - 420 results of 57,899 for search '(( a ((((teer decrease) OR (mean decrease))) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( i large decrease ))', query time: 1.07s Refine Results
  1. 401
  2. 402

    Spreading Electron Density Thin: Increasing the Chromophore Size in Polyaromatic Wires Decreases Interchromophoric Electronic Coupling by Mohammad M. Hossain (420598)

    Published 2018
    “…However, it is not well-understood how the interchromophoric electronic coupling varies with the chromophore size in linearly connected molecular wires. Here, we show with the aid of electrochemistry, electronic spectroscopy, density functional theory calculations, and theoretical modeling that as the number of aromatic moieties in a single chromophore increases, the interchromophoric electronic coupling decreases and may reach negligible values if the chromophore is sufficiently large. …”
  3. 403
  4. 404
  5. 405
  6. 406

    S1 Data - by Chiara Remondi (15301459)

    Published 2023
    “…Data were drawn from seven waves of the Parenting Across Cultures (PAC) project, a large-scale longitudinal, cross-cultural study, and included 200 Italian children (<i>M</i><sub>AgeAtTime1</sub> = 9.80, <i>SD</i> = 0.65; 50.5% girls) and their parents (200 mothers; 190 fathers). …”
  7. 407
  8. 408
  9. 409
  10. 410
  11. 411
  12. 412
  13. 413
  14. 414
  15. 415
  16. 416
  17. 417
  18. 418
  19. 419

    Distribution of plasmid profiles (with decreasing order of large plasmid) and incompatibility types in <i>S</i>.... by Priyanka Jain (105065)

    Published 2018
    “…<p>Distribution of plasmid profiles (with decreasing order of large plasmid) and incompatibility types in <i>S</i>. …”
  20. 420

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”