Search alternatives:
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larvae decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
i larvae » _ larval (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larvae decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
i larvae » _ larval (Expand Search)
-
301
-
302
-
303
-
304
-
305
Hardness preference in <i>Drosophila</i> larvae, as a relevant cue for varying feeding substrates.
Published 2025“…Different letters (A or B) denote <i>p</i> < 0.05. C’: Two-choice navigation preference between 2.5% agarose and 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1% agarose, respectively. …”
-
306
-
307
Age-associated candidate <i>P. regina</i> transcripts identified by linear regression analysis.
Published 2025“…<p>Linear regression was used to identify transcripts with consistent changes in expression across developmental time points (80 h to 130 <b>h)</b>. …”
-
308
-
309
-
310
The number of IHC ribbons in <i>Diap3</i>-overexpressing mice decreases significantly over time.
Published 2013“…<p>(A) Means of IHC ribbons (and mean ± SEM) at 4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks are shown. …”
-
311
Female bitransgenic mice show abnormal spontaneous physical activity and decreased oxygen consumption and body temperature.
Published 2011“…Physical activity was presented as mean ± SEM. The slope coefficients of best-fit linear regression curves for the night activity were markedly different between bitransgenic mice and their littermate controls (shown as insert). …”
-
312
-
313
-
314
-
315
-
316
Measurement of reproductive performance in Tü wild-type fish, F<sub>1</sub> generation.
Published 2022Subjects: -
317
-
318
-
319
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
320