Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
26621
-
26622
-
26623
-
26624
-
26625
-
26626
-
26627
-
26628
-
26629
-
26630
-
26631
-
26632
Physical activity levels and sitting times of study participants (n = 382).
Published 2024Subjects: -
26633
-
26634
-
26635
-
26636
Data_Sheet_1_Density Decline in a Mediterranean Seahorse Population: Natural Fluctuations or New Emerging Threats?.PDF
Published 2021“…During the routine monitoring of this population in 2016, a dramatic density decrease was observed. By using questionnaires and long-term datasets, the present study determined possible causes of this decline by investigating habitat changes, temperature trends and the existence of seahorse trafficking while also examining abundance trends during the last decade. …”
-
26637
Table 3_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: −0.96 to −0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. …”
-
26638
Table 2_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx
Published 2025“…The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: −0.96 to −0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. …”
-
26639
Table 1_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.xlsx
Published 2025“…The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: −0.96 to −0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. …”
-
26640
Data from "A Historical Misstep: Niche Shift to Specialisation Is Pushing Insular Ginger Towards an Evolutionary Dead End"
Published 2025“…<i>Z. shuanglongense</i>, as the specialist, despite an initial increase during the Last Glacial Maximum (~22 Kya), has been subjected to a long-term decrease in effective population size (<i>Ne</i>), while <i>Z. pleiostachyum</i> is on the contrary increasing, leading to a significantly larger current <i>Ne</i>. …”