Showing 26,621 - 26,640 results of 226,405 for search '(( a ((a decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( a ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 1.34s Refine Results
  1. 26621
  2. 26622
  3. 26623
  4. 26624
  5. 26625
  6. 26626
  7. 26627
  8. 26628
  9. 26629
  10. 26630
  11. 26631
  12. 26632
  13. 26633
  14. 26634
  15. 26635
  16. 26636

    Data_Sheet_1_Density Decline in a Mediterranean Seahorse Population: Natural Fluctuations or New Emerging Threats?.PDF by Cataldo Pierri (11306877)

    Published 2021
    “…During the routine monitoring of this population in 2016, a dramatic density decrease was observed. By using questionnaires and long-term datasets, the present study determined possible causes of this decline by investigating habitat changes, temperature trends and the existence of seahorse trafficking while also examining abundance trends during the last decade. …”
  17. 26637

    Table 3_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx by Xu Yan (110026)

    Published 2025
    “…The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: −0.96 to −0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. …”
  18. 26638

    Table 2_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.docx by Xu Yan (110026)

    Published 2025
    “…The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: −0.96 to −0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. …”
  19. 26639

    Table 1_How does ego depletion reduce sports performance in athletes? A systematic meta-analysis.xlsx by Xu Yan (110026)

    Published 2025
    “…The final total effect size of ego depletion on athletes’ sports performance SMD = −0.38 [95% CI: −0.56 to −0.21], P = 0.001, demonstrating that ego depletion can produce a decrease in athletes’ sports performance. Subgroup meta-analysis showed that the Stroop task SMD = 0.63 [95% CI: −0.96 to −0.26] produced larger effect sizes than the transcription task SMD = 0.39 [95% CI: −0.64 to −0.13], i.e., the Stroop task was more likely to produce ego depletion in athletes. …”
  20. 26640

    Data from "A Historical Misstep: Niche Shift to Specialisation Is Pushing Insular Ginger Towards an Evolutionary Dead End" by Min-Wei Chai (15899033)

    Published 2025
    “…<i>Z. shuanglongense</i>, as the specialist, despite an initial increase during the Last Glacial Maximum (~22 Kya), has been subjected to a long-term decrease in effective population size (<i>Ne</i>), while <i>Z. pleiostachyum</i> is on the contrary increasing, leading to a significantly larger current <i>Ne</i>. …”