Showing 46,561 - 46,580 results of 226,405 for search '(( a ((a decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ) OR ( a ((latent decrease) OR (largest decrease)) ))', query time: 1.73s Refine Results
  1. 46561
  2. 46562
  3. 46563
  4. 46564
  5. 46565

    Simplified model accounts for signatures of decision uncertainty. by Nadim A. A. Atiya (8394315)

    Published 2020
    “…<p>(a) Uncertainty as a function of coherence level. ‘<’ pattern: Uncertainty increases (decreases) with coherence level for error (correct) choices. …”
  6. 46566

    UM parameter offers an implicit, low-dimensional marker of metacognitive (dys)function. by Nadim A. A. Atiya (8394315)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>Symptom scores from experiment 1 were entered into a multiple regression model predicting the strength of uncertainty modulation, empirical mean confidence, and metacognitive sensitivity. …”
  7. 46567
  8. 46568
  9. 46569

    TLR3 knock-out macrophages. Wild type and TLR3 knock-out macrophages were infected with DV1. by A. M. A. Nasirudeen (358016)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(A) Cell lysates and total RNA were collected for analysis. …”
  10. 46570
  11. 46571
  12. 46572
  13. 46573
  14. 46574

    Experimental results. by Nadim A. A. Atiya (8394315)

    Published 2020
    “…Probability of a change-of-mind peaks at low-to-intermediate coherence levels, and decreases sharply at high coherence levels, with correct changes being more frequent than error changes at moderate to high coherence levels (0.128 and 0.256). …”
  15. 46575

    PLINK outperforms BCFtools with respect to false negative rates, but underperforms with respect to false positive rates. by Gabriel A. A. Silva (19996766)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>A) False positive (<i>i</i>.<i>e</i>., incorrectly calling a base position as being located in a ROH) and B) false negative (<i>i</i>.…”
  16. 46576

    Model accounts for subjects’ confidence reports and individual differences in uncertainty modulation predict symptom scores. by Nadim A. A. Atiya (8394315)

    Published 2021
    “…Confidence increases (decreases) as a function of changing task difficulty for correct (error) responses. …”
  17. 46577

    Model accounts for subjects’ perceptual performance in experiment 1. by Nadim A. A. Atiya (8394315)

    Published 2021
    “…The typical ‘<‘ pattern, i.e. response times for correct (error) responses increasing (decreasing) as a function of task difficulty, is found in both the model and data. …”
  18. 46578

    Model simulation results. by Nadim A. A. Atiya (8394315)

    Published 2020
    “…Similar to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007149#pcbi.1007149.g003" target="_blank">Fig 3b</a>, probability of a change-of-mind is the highest at low-to-intermediate coherence levels, and decreases sharply at high coherence levels. …”
  19. 46579

    Flow diagram of exam selection. by Atsushi Abe (9396077)

    Published 2023
    “…Multivariate analysis showed that C-reactive protein (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.45, p<0.01) and tongue pressure (odds ratio: 3.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–12.60, p<0.05) were independent risk factors for oral hypofunction. Oral function decreased in perioperative patients with gastric cancer, and decreased tongue pressure is associated with a decreased prognostic nutritional index.…”
  20. 46580

    Patient background. by Atsushi Abe (9396077)

    Published 2023
    “…Multivariate analysis showed that C-reactive protein (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.45, p<0.01) and tongue pressure (odds ratio: 3.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–12.60, p<0.05) were independent risk factors for oral hypofunction. Oral function decreased in perioperative patients with gastric cancer, and decreased tongue pressure is associated with a decreased prognostic nutritional index.…”