Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
latent decrease » latency decreased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
latent decrease » latency decreased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
46561
-
46562
-
46563
-
46564
-
46565
Simplified model accounts for signatures of decision uncertainty.
Published 2020“…<p>(a) Uncertainty as a function of coherence level. ‘<’ pattern: Uncertainty increases (decreases) with coherence level for error (correct) choices. …”
-
46566
UM parameter offers an implicit, low-dimensional marker of metacognitive (dys)function.
Published 2021“…<p>Symptom scores from experiment 1 were entered into a multiple regression model predicting the strength of uncertainty modulation, empirical mean confidence, and metacognitive sensitivity. …”
-
46567
-
46568
-
46569
TLR3 knock-out macrophages. Wild type and TLR3 knock-out macrophages were infected with DV1.
Published 2013“…<p>(A) Cell lysates and total RNA were collected for analysis. …”
-
46570
-
46571
-
46572
-
46573
-
46574
Experimental results.
Published 2020“…Probability of a change-of-mind peaks at low-to-intermediate coherence levels, and decreases sharply at high coherence levels, with correct changes being more frequent than error changes at moderate to high coherence levels (0.128 and 0.256). …”
-
46575
PLINK outperforms BCFtools with respect to false negative rates, but underperforms with respect to false positive rates.
Published 2024“…<p>A) False positive (<i>i</i>.<i>e</i>., incorrectly calling a base position as being located in a ROH) and B) false negative (<i>i</i>.…”
-
46576
Model accounts for subjects’ confidence reports and individual differences in uncertainty modulation predict symptom scores.
Published 2021“…Confidence increases (decreases) as a function of changing task difficulty for correct (error) responses. …”
-
46577
Model accounts for subjects’ perceptual performance in experiment 1.
Published 2021“…The typical ‘<‘ pattern, i.e. response times for correct (error) responses increasing (decreasing) as a function of task difficulty, is found in both the model and data. …”
-
46578
Model simulation results.
Published 2020“…Similar to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007149#pcbi.1007149.g003" target="_blank">Fig 3b</a>, probability of a change-of-mind is the highest at low-to-intermediate coherence levels, and decreases sharply at high coherence levels. …”
-
46579
Flow diagram of exam selection.
Published 2023“…Multivariate analysis showed that C-reactive protein (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.45, p<0.01) and tongue pressure (odds ratio: 3.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–12.60, p<0.05) were independent risk factors for oral hypofunction. Oral function decreased in perioperative patients with gastric cancer, and decreased tongue pressure is associated with a decreased prognostic nutritional index.…”
-
46580
Patient background.
Published 2023“…Multivariate analysis showed that C-reactive protein (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.30–0.45, p<0.01) and tongue pressure (odds ratio: 3.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.04–12.60, p<0.05) were independent risk factors for oral hypofunction. Oral function decreased in perioperative patients with gastric cancer, and decreased tongue pressure is associated with a decreased prognostic nutritional index.…”