Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
values decrease » values increased (Expand Search)
ct values » _ values (Expand Search), i values (Expand Search)
-
101
-
102
-
103
Summary statistics of key variables.
Published 2024“…We find that in developing countries, as urban economic density increases, innovation first increases and then begins to decrease beyond a certain point, with the decline being most prominent in the largest cities. …”
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
Data Sheet 1_Prognostic impact of dynamic changes of type I melanoma antigen gene proteins CT7 (MAGE-C1/CT7) transcripts in multiple myeloma.docx
Published 2025“…Our data showed the predictive value of peri-ASCT frontline treatment. A 2-log decrease of MAGE-C1/CT7 post-induction cycle 2 compared to baseline correlated with a negative peri-ASCT MAGE-C1/CT7 status, providing an earlier prognostic marker of treatment response.…”
-
110
-
111
-
112
-
113
The 20 most common procedures.
Published 2025“…The most dramatic decrease was found in county hospitals where elective surgery was reduced by 28% and the largest effect was found in Ear, Nose, and Throat/oral surgery (−34%). …”
-
114
Number of procedures during the four waves.
Published 2025“…The most dramatic decrease was found in county hospitals where elective surgery was reduced by 28% and the largest effect was found in Ear, Nose, and Throat/oral surgery (−34%). …”
-
115
-
116
-
117
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
118
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
119
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
120
Flow of premises through the study.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Methods and findings</p><p>The study was conducted between February and May 2023, in 13 licensed premises in England. It used an A-B-A reversal design, set over 3 consecutive 4-weekly periods with “A” representing the nonintervention periods during which standard serving sizes were served, and “B” representing the intervention period when the largest serving size of draught beer (1 imperial pint (568 ml)) was removed from existing ranges so that the largest size available was two-thirds of a pint. …”