Search alternatives:
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
set sizes » set size (Expand Search)
largest decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
set sizes » set size (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Female regression coefficients for regression #3 across development in set size = 2 and set size = 4.
Published 2024“…All statistics are done identically and are reported in the text. There was a slight decrease in the regression coefficient weight of intercept for set size = 2 (A), but not set size = 4 (F). …”
-
4
-
5
Effect of session on winning model parameters for set size = 2 and set size = 4 for both male and females.
Published 2024“…<p>To test if mice adjusted one-back strategies with experience, we next compared how parameter weights (y-axis) changed across the 6 sessions analyzed for each mouse (x-axis). Since set size = 2 and set size = 4 days were interspersed, we combined set size data and analyzed sessions chronologically. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Strategy parameters across development for female mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…However, female mice had a significant decrease in parameter S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” in set size = 4 (H: <i>p</i> = 0.04) with a trend in a similar direction in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.08).…”
-
10
Strategy parameters across development for male mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…RL parameter <i>α</i><sub>+</sub> learning rate and decision noise parameter softmax <i>β</i> were stable across development in both set size = 2 (A-B) and set size = 4 (F-G). Both parameters S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” and S3 “Inappropriate Lose-Stay” decreased significantly with age in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.02, E: <i>p</i> = 0.04), but not in set size = 4 (H,J). …”
-
11
Flow of premises through the study.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Methods and findings</p><p>The study was conducted between February and May 2023, in 13 licensed premises in England. It used an A-B-A reversal design, set over 3 consecutive 4-weekly periods with “A” representing the nonintervention periods during which standard serving sizes were served, and “B” representing the intervention period when the largest serving size of draught beer (1 imperial pint (568 ml)) was removed from existing ranges so that the largest size available was two-thirds of a pint. …”
-
12
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Variables of trees located at coordinates .
Published 2025“…Furthermore, uncertainty analysis showed that the mean MSI of the population decreased over a 100-year period without weevil predation, and this trend was exacerbated by the presence of weevil predation.…”
-
17
Global parameters and variables for the model.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, uncertainty analysis showed that the mean MSI of the population decreased over a 100-year period without weevil predation, and this trend was exacerbated by the presence of weevil predation.…”
-
18
Variables of patch located at coordinates .
Published 2025“…Furthermore, uncertainty analysis showed that the mean MSI of the population decreased over a 100-year period without weevil predation, and this trend was exacerbated by the presence of weevil predation.…”
-
19
MRSP Data collected in March 2018.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, uncertainty analysis showed that the mean MSI of the population decreased over a 100-year period without weevil predation, and this trend was exacerbated by the presence of weevil predation.…”
-
20