Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
24901
Table_3_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.docx
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24902
Image_4_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24903
Image_1_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24904
Image_3_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24905
Image_6_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24906
Image_7_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24907
Image_8_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24908
Table_3_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.docx
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24909
Image_8_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24910
Image_2_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24911
Table_1_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.docx
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24912
Image_1_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24913
-
24914
Image_4_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24915
Image_7_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24916
Image_9_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24917
-
24918
Image_5_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24919
Image_9_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2020“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”
-
24920
Image_6_Loss of CDYL Results in Suppression of CTNNB1 and Decreased Endometrial Receptivity.TIF
Published 2025“…However, the expression of CDYL was downregulated in the endometrial tissues obtained from women with RIF, consistently with the protein level of LIF, which is a marker of endometrial receptivity. In CDYL-knockdown human endometrial Ishikawa cells, we identified 1738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). …”