Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
8541
-
8542
-
8543
-
8544
-
8545
-
8546
-
8547
-
8548
-
8549
Dinuclear Gold(I) Isocyanide Complexes with Luminescent Properties, and Displaying Thermotropic Liquid Crystalline Behavior
Published 2006“…The single-crystal X-ray diffraction structures of [μ-(4,4‘-CN-R-NC){Au(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>4</sub>OC<i><sub>n</sub></i>H<sub>2</sub><i><sub>n</sub></i><sub>+1</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>] (R = 4-4‘-biphenylene and 2,2‘-dichloro-4-4‘-biphenylene) have been determined confirming the rodlike structure of the molecule, with a linear coordination around the gold atoms. There are Au···Au interactions in the 2,2‘-dichlorobiphenyl derivative but not in the 4-4‘-biphenyl compound.…”
-
8550
-
8551
-
8552
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cooling-Reheating Protocol Indicates Decreased Fat Fraction via Lipid Consumption in Suspected Brown Adipose Tissue
Published 2015“…</p><p>Results</p><p>sBAT-FF decreased after cold exposure (mean change in percentage points = -1.94 pp, P = 0.021) whereas no change was observed in SAT-FF (mean = 0.23 pp, P = 0.314). sBAT-R<sub>2</sub>* tended to increase (mean = 0.65 s<sup>-1</sup>, P = 0.051) and SAT-R<sub>2</sub>* increased (mean = 0.40 s<sup>-1</sup>, P = 0.038) after cold exposure. sBAT-FF remained decreased after reheating (mean = -1.92 pp, P = 0.008, compared to baseline) whereas SAT-FF decreased (mean = -0.79 pp, P = 0.008, compared to after cold exposure).…”
-
8553
-
8554
-
8555
-
8556
-
8557
-
8558
Competitive Arsenate and Phosphate Adsorption on Ferrihydrite as Described by the CD-MUSIC Model
Published 2022“…This causes a flatter adsorption isotherm for As(V), which leads to a stronger As(V) adsorption as the As(V)-to-Fe ratio decreases, compared to that for PO<sub>4</sub>.…”
-
8559
-
8560