Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
latent decrease » latency decreased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
latent decrease » latency decreased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
8121
Predictive Modeling of pH in an Aquaponics System Using Bayesian and Non-Bayesian Linear Regression to Inform System Maintenance
Published 2021“…These systems can be a good source of fresh food but must maintain a delicate balance between the water quality requirements of the fish, plants, and nitrifying bacteria or risk decreased production, disease, and death. …”
-
8122
Decreased Sho levels correlate with the amount of PrP<sup>Sc</sup> C2 fragment present in prion-infected animals.
Published 2011“…Infection with RML prions resulted in the largest decrease in Sho levels and the highest amount of PrP<sup>Sc</sup> C2 fragment (determined after digestion with thermolysin (TL) and PNGaseF). …”
-
8123
-
8124
-
8125
Connectivity between the left nucleus accumbens and two clusters.
Published 2025“…After intervention there was a significant decrease in the FR group (mean at V1: 0.249 ± 0.094, mean at V5: 0.130 ± 0.101, difference: −0.119 ± 0.097, p < 0.001) and a significant increase in the SM group (mean at V1: 0.156 ± 0.113, mean at V5: 0.287 ± 0.107, difference: 0.131 ± 0.066, p < 0.001). …”
-
8126
Patterns of lifetime use of substances by gender.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
8127
S1 Data -
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
8128
Factors associated with substance use.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
8129
Factors associated with personality traits.
Published 2023“…The lifetime prevalence of substance use was 41.5%, while that of alcohol use was 36%. For both, a higher mean neuroticism score [substance use- (AOR 1.05, 95%CI; 1, 1.10: p = 0.013); alcohol use- (AOR 1.04, 95%CI; 0.99, 1.09: p = 0.032)] showed increased odds of lifetime use, while a higher mean agreeableness score [substance use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.008); alcohol use- (AOR 0.99, 95%CI; 0.95, 1.02: p = 0.032)] showed decreased odds of lifetime use. …”
-
8130
-
8131
-
8132
Data supporting this article.
Published 2025“…Clinical variables did not significantly differed between FR and SM groups. Mean VAS decreased by −12.3 mm ± 15.2 in FR group (n = 15) and −17.9 mm ± 29.4 in SM group (n = 15). …”
-
8133
Demographic and clinical data at baseline.
Published 2025“…Clinical variables did not significantly differed between FR and SM groups. Mean VAS decreased by −12.3 mm ± 15.2 in FR group (n = 15) and −17.9 mm ± 29.4 in SM group (n = 15). …”
-
8134
Changes in clinical variables.
Published 2025“…Clinical variables did not significantly differed between FR and SM groups. Mean VAS decreased by −12.3 mm ± 15.2 in FR group (n = 15) and −17.9 mm ± 29.4 in SM group (n = 15). …”
-
8135
-
8136
-
8137
-
8138
-
8139
Mean ± SEM FPKM values measured for differentially expressed genes.
Published 2015“…Several genes were abbreviated for simplicity: “PPBP,PF4,CXCL” includes Ppbp/Pf4/Cxcl1/Pf4v1/ Cxcl6/ Cxcl3/ Cxcl5/ Cxcl2/ Il8/ Cxcl10/ Cxc11; “CLK,PPIL3” includes Clk3/Ppil3/Clk1/Clk4). The mean FPKM values, P-values, sequence length, and exon density for each of these genes can be found in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0131669#pone.0131669.s005" target="_blank">S1</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0131669#pone.0131669.s007" target="_blank">S3</a> Tables.…”
-
8140
Sensitivity of mean population biomass and cumulative harvest to initial biomass.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean population biomass (a,b) and cumulative harvest (c,d) under fixed and (annual) climate adaptive management, showing sensitivity to initial biomass (). …”