Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
latent decrease » latency decreased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
latent decrease » latency decreased (Expand Search), content decreased (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
11981
-
11982
Expression of miR-34a in CD44<sup>hi</sup> and CD44<sup>lo</sup> cells evaluated by RT-qPCR and exogenous delivery of miR-34a into CD44<sup>hi</sup> cells inhibits colony formation...
Published 2013“…The miR-34a expression has been normalized with RNU48. (<b>B</b>) Sorted CD44<sup>hi</sup> cells (samples M-1 and M-2) when transduced with miR-34a show decreased colony forming efficiency in comparison to miR-control transduced CD44<sup>hi</sup> tumor cells; (Sample M-1: miR control = 131.6 (SD = 30.5),+miR-34a = 7 (SD = 2.6) and P = 0.002; Sample M-2: miR control = 75 (SD = 19.6),+miR-34a = 23 (SD = 5.5) and P = 0.01); The mean effect with miR-34a versus miR-control on CD44<sup>hi</sup> cells is −88.3 (95% CI: −288.12, 111.45; P = 0.112) (<b>C</b>) Sorted CD44<sup>hi</sup> tumor cells transduced with miR-34a exhibit small colony size (bottom panel) than miR-control transduced CD44<sup>hi</sup> tumor cells (upper panel); (<b>D</b>) The CD44<sup>lo</sup> cells from Sample M-1 and M-2 transduced with anti-miR34a show increased colony forming efficiency than tumor cells transduced with miR-control; (Sample M-1: miR control = 21 (SD = 4.5),+anti- miR-34a = 33 (SD = 5.2) and P = 0.04; Sample M-2: miR control = 24.6 (SD = 4.1),+anti-miR-34a = 39.3 (SD = 5.1) and P = 0.018); The mean effect with anti-miR-34a versus miR-control on CD44<sup>lo</sup> cells is −13.3 (95% CI: −20.43, 47.10; P = 0.125). …”
-
11983
-
11984
Early surface PSA-NCAM reduction induced by glutamate exposure.
Published 2014“…<p>Hippocampal neurons in culture (DIV 12–13) were briefly exposed to 5 µM glutamate and evaluated 1, 3 and 6 h later. (A) Microphotographs of hippocampal neurons in culture doubled stained for surface PSA-NCAM and total NCAM. …”
-
11985
-
11986
-
11987
-
11988
-
11989
-
11990
-
11991
-
11992
-
11993
Time-course of changes induced on NCAM and SYN synaptic patterns and levels by glutamate exposure.
Published 2014“…<p>Hippocampal neurons in culture (DIV 12–13) were briefly exposed to 5 µM glutamate and evaluated 1, 3, 6 and 12 h later. (A) Microphotographs of hippocampal neurons in culture doubled stained for NCAM and SYN. …”
-
11994
-
11995
-
11996
-
11997
MakA causes disruption of intracellular organelles.
Published 2021“…Flow cytometry analysis indicates concentration dependent decrease in lysotracker staining. Data points represents two to three biologically independent experiments; bar graphs show mean ± s.d. …”
-
11998
-
11999
Inverse relationship of Cp values with virus titre when 2 PCR protocols using CHIKV-A226 and -226V were evaluated.
Published 2010“…<p>Both assays, when tested on CHIKV-A226 and -226V, indicate excellent linear reliability between the decrease of Cp values and the increase in virus titre.…”
-
12000