Showing 5,961 - 5,980 results of 8,318 for search '(( a ((nn decrease) OR (teer decrease)) ) OR ( i ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.50s Refine Results
  1. 5961

    Capillary Zone Electrophoresis–Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Large-Scale Phosphoproteomics with the Production of over 11,000 Phosphopeptides from the Colon Carcinoma HCT116 Cell Li... by Daoyang Chen (4732431)

    Published 2019
    “…According to our modeling data, phosphorylation decreases peptide’s charge roughly by one charge unit, resulting in dramatic decrease in electrophoretic mobility. …”
  2. 5962

    Quantification of Errors in Ordinal Outcome Scales Using Shannon Entropy: Effect on Sample Size Calculations by Pitchaiah Mandava (431210)

    Published 2013
    “…Each trial’s mRS distribution was multiplied with the noise distribution from published mRS inter-rater variability to generate an error percentage for “shift” and dichotomized cut-points. For the SAINT I neuroprotectant trial, considered positive by “shift” mRS while the larger follow-up SAINT II trial was negative, we recalculated sample size required if classification uncertainty was taken into account.…”
  3. 5963

    Functional Performance of Different Venous Limb Options in Simulated Neonatal/Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits by Luiz Fernando Caneo (4701865)

    Published 2018
    “…Two setups were used with two circuits for each one. In Setup I, a neonatal oxygenator was connected to dual 3/16" ID venous limbs (Circuit A) or to a single 1/4" ID venous limb (Circuit B); and in Setup II, a pediatric oxygenator was connected to dual 1/4" ID venous limbs (Circuit C) or a single 3/8" ID venous limb (Circuit D). …”
  4. 5964

    GENomE wide analysis of sotalol-induced IKr inhibition during ventricular REPOLarization, “GENEREPOL study”: Lack of common variants with large effect sizes by Joe-Elie Salem (4351000)

    Published 2017
    “…</p><p>This study supports the lack of common variants with larger effect sizes than one would expect based on previous ECG genome-wide-association studies.…”
  5. 5965
  6. 5966
  7. 5967
  8. 5968
  9. 5969
  10. 5970
  11. 5971
  12. 5972
  13. 5973
  14. 5974
  15. 5975
  16. 5976

    Image_3_Measurement of the burdens of neonatal disorders in 204 countries, 1990–2019: a global burden of disease-based study.jpg by Juan Xin (5745998)

    Published 2024
    “…Conversely, the ASDR and ASR-DALYs experienced the largest decrease in Central Europe (EAPC = −5.10, 95%CI = −5.28 to 4.93) and East Asia (EAPC = −4.07, 95%CI = −4.41 to 3.73), respectively. …”
  17. 5977

    Image_4_Measurement of the burdens of neonatal disorders in 204 countries, 1990–2019: a global burden of disease-based study.jpg by Juan Xin (5745998)

    Published 2024
    “…Conversely, the ASDR and ASR-DALYs experienced the largest decrease in Central Europe (EAPC = −5.10, 95%CI = −5.28 to 4.93) and East Asia (EAPC = −4.07, 95%CI = −4.41 to 3.73), respectively. …”
  18. 5978

    Image_5_Measurement of the burdens of neonatal disorders in 204 countries, 1990–2019: a global burden of disease-based study.jpg by Juan Xin (5745998)

    Published 2024
    “…Conversely, the ASDR and ASR-DALYs experienced the largest decrease in Central Europe (EAPC = −5.10, 95%CI = −5.28 to 4.93) and East Asia (EAPC = −4.07, 95%CI = −4.41 to 3.73), respectively. …”
  19. 5979

    Image_7_Measurement of the burdens of neonatal disorders in 204 countries, 1990–2019: a global burden of disease-based study.jpg by Juan Xin (5745998)

    Published 2024
    “…Conversely, the ASDR and ASR-DALYs experienced the largest decrease in Central Europe (EAPC = −5.10, 95%CI = −5.28 to 4.93) and East Asia (EAPC = −4.07, 95%CI = −4.41 to 3.73), respectively. …”
  20. 5980

    Image_2_Measurement of the burdens of neonatal disorders in 204 countries, 1990–2019: a global burden of disease-based study.jpg by Juan Xin (5745998)

    Published 2024
    “…Conversely, the ASDR and ASR-DALYs experienced the largest decrease in Central Europe (EAPC = −5.10, 95%CI = −5.28 to 4.93) and East Asia (EAPC = −4.07, 95%CI = −4.41 to 3.73), respectively. …”