Showing 5,781 - 5,800 results of 226,904 for search '(( a ((peer decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( i ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 1.58s Refine Results
  1. 5781
  2. 5782
  3. 5783

    Photoinactivation of PSD-95-4c decreases GluR2 staining with no changes in NR1 or TfR staining. by Guillermo A. Yudowski (102587)

    Published 2013
    “…Only GluR2 in the FlAsH group showed a significant decrease (16% ±5 <i>n</i> = 7). (C) PSD-95-4c distribution was not changes after FALI. …”
  4. 5784

    Local inhibition of nitrergic activity in tenotomized rats accelerates muscle regeneration by increasing fiber area and decreasing central core lesions by A.D. Seabra (6515330)

    Published 2019
    “…<div><p>Muscular atrophy is a progressive degeneration characterized by muscular proteolysis, loss of mass and decrease in fiber area. …”
  5. 5785
  6. 5786
  7. 5787

    Plasma membrane localized KCa3.1 is decreased by DN Rab1 and Rab8, but not by Rab2 or Rab6. by Claudia A. Bertuccio (309866)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>HEK293 cells were co-transfected with BLAP-KCa3.1 and either WT, DA or DN Rabs 1, 2, 6 or 8 and plasma membrane localized KCa3.1 evaluated by specific biotinylation, streptavidin labeling and IB (see Methods). As shown in <b>A</b> and <b>C</b>, DN Rab8 (T22N) and two different DN Rab1s (N124I, S25N) decreased expression of plasma membrane KCa3.1. …”
  8. 5788

    Table1_Discontinuation of afterload-reducing drugs decreases left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.docx by Anselm A. Derda (5866220)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>16 patients discontinued their afterload-reducing drugs, resulting in a significant decrease in median LVOT gradient from 86.5 [60.5–109.3] mmHg to 61.5 [28.3–97.50] mmHg (p = 0.0004). …”
  9. 5789

    Table1_Discontinuation of afterload-reducing drugs decreases left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.docx by Anselm A. Derda (5866220)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>16 patients discontinued their afterload-reducing drugs, resulting in a significant decrease in median LVOT gradient from 86.5 [60.5–109.3] mmHg to 61.5 [28.3–97.50] mmHg (p = 0.0004). …”
  10. 5790
  11. 5791
  12. 5792

    CHIP Regulates AKT/FoxO/Bim Signaling in MCF7 and MCF10A Cells by Yanrong Lv (500561)

    Published 2013
    “…<div><p>A number of studies have shown that apoptosis resistance can be observed in multiple human tumors; however the detailed mechanism remains unclear. …”
  13. 5793

    Overexpression of GFP-Rab22a does not induce PrP<sup>Sc</sup> degradation. by Zrinka Marijanovic (218099)

    Published 2009
    “…Note that NH<sub>4</sub>Cl does not affect Rab22a-induced decrease in PrP<sup>Sc</sup> levels (p = 0,083, t-test).…”
  14. 5794
  15. 5795
  16. 5796

    Interaction between MED19a and HaRxL44 is important for HaRxL44–induced MED19a degradation via proteasome. by Marie-Cécile Caillaud (3212142)

    Published 2013
    “…All the confocal pictures were taken with PMT 1 (494–541 nm) at Gain: 864 and PMT 2 (591–649 nm) at Gain: 844. Note the decrease in GFP-MED19a transformed cells in the presence of RFP-HaRxL44 in comparison with RFP alone or RFP-HaRxL44<sup>M</sup>.…”
  17. 5797

    Inhibition of <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> inflammatory responses in rats by p30A peptide. by Jérôme Rambert (46851)

    Published 2013
    “…(D) Histopathologic analysis confirm p30A ability to decrease all components of AIA lesions: pannus formation and inflammation of the synovium (P), deformity of joint and bones (asterix), bone remodeling and destruction (arrowhead), bone neoformation (arrows) and cartilage destruction.…”
  18. 5798
  19. 5799
  20. 5800

    Effect of MNC hUCB cell administration on microglial cell density in the spinal cord of G93A mice. by Svitlana Garbuzova-Davis (81764)

    Published 2013
    “…B) In the lumbar spinal cord, a significant decrease of microglial cell density was observed in mice receiving 10×10<sup>6</sup> and 25×10<sup>6</sup> cells vs. …”