Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
peer decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
peer decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
7641
-
7642
-
7643
Fig 3 -
Published 2025“…<p>Estimated marginal means (± SE) of momentary frequency of highest amplitude (MFHA; A.1-A.3) as well as amplitudes (B.1-B.3) for each intervention, LF, IM, and HF frequency bands, and each section. …”
-
7644
-
7645
Patient demographics.
Published 2025“…Redness in the nasal limbal and bulbar conjunctivae significantly decreased. The mean LLT tended to increase after treatment. …”
-
7646
-
7647
Flowchart of overall study protocol.
Published 2025“…Redness in the nasal limbal and bulbar conjunctivae significantly decreased. The mean LLT tended to increase after treatment. …”
-
7648
-
7649
-
7650
-
7651
-
7652
-
7653
-
7654
-
7655
-
7656
-
7657
Demographic characteristics of participants.
Published 2023“…The mean FD value and standard deviation at T0 was 1.2860 ± 0.0896, while at T1, it was 1.2508±0.1023; thus, significant differences were detected (p = 0.022). …”
-
7658
FD values of BSMs in different ROIs and time.
Published 2023“…The mean FD value and standard deviation at T0 was 1.2860 ± 0.0896, while at T1, it was 1.2508±0.1023; thus, significant differences were detected (p = 0.022). …”
-
7659
-
7660