Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
5481
-
5482
-
5483
-
5484
-
5485
-
5486
-
5487
-
5488
The research process for the present study.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
5489
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
5490
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
5491
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
5492
-
5493
-
5494
Histogram of ability estimates.
Published 2024“…To resolve this problem, we propose a new IRT model that introduces two parameters: (1) a rater–item interaction parameter representing the rater severity for each evaluation item and (2) an item-specific step-difficulty parameter representing the difference in rating scales among evaluation items. …”
-
5495
Results of parameter-recovery experiments.
Published 2024“…To resolve this problem, we propose a new IRT model that introduces two parameters: (1) a rater–item interaction parameter representing the rater severity for each evaluation item and (2) an item-specific step-difficulty parameter representing the difference in rating scales among evaluation items. …”
-
5496
Evaluation items in the scoring rubric.
Published 2024“…To resolve this problem, we propose a new IRT model that introduces two parameters: (1) a rater–item interaction parameter representing the rater severity for each evaluation item and (2) an item-specific step-difficulty parameter representing the difference in rating scales among evaluation items. …”
-
5497
IRCs for each rater in item 1.
Published 2024“…To resolve this problem, we propose a new IRT model that introduces two parameters: (1) a rater–item interaction parameter representing the rater severity for each evaluation item and (2) an item-specific step-difficulty parameter representing the difference in rating scales among evaluation items. …”
-
5498
Estimates of rater parameters.
Published 2024“…To resolve this problem, we propose a new IRT model that introduces two parameters: (1) a rater–item interaction parameter representing the rater severity for each evaluation item and (2) an item-specific step-difficulty parameter representing the difference in rating scales among evaluation items. …”
-
5499
-
5500