Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
781
-
782
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
783
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
784
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
785
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
786
Low concentrations of siRNA TMPRSS2-ERG III and IV impair TMPRSS2-ERG oncogene and oncoprotein levels but not cell viability.
Published 2015“…One hundred percent cell viability corresponds to the number of living cells incubated with transfecting agent only. Results are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments containing 8 replicates for each condition. * = <i>p</i><0.05, ** = <i>p</i><0.01, *** = <i>p</i><0.001, significant decrease compared to untreated cells (TA) or to siRNA Control (Kruskal & Wallis followed by Tukey and Dunnet test).…”
-
787
-
788
-
789
-
790
-
791
Effects of siRNA TMPRSS2-ERG on ERG protein expression and cell viability.
Published 2015“…<p>VCaP cells were transfected for 24h, 48h and 72h with 50 nM of siRNAs TMPRSS2-ERG III (1, 2, 3), siRNAs TMPRSS2-ERG IV (1, 2), siRNA against ERG wild type or siRNA Control. <b>a. Western blot analysis:</b> the expression of ERG protein detected by Western blot showed the effects of siRNAs against TMPRSS2-ERG, ERG wild type or siRNA Control. …”
-
792
-
793
-
794
-
795
-
796
-
797
The Prognostic Value of Decreased LKB1 in Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis
Published 2016“…Additionally, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated that decreased LKB1 was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.09–2.36, P = 0.017), lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.53–3.78, P<0.001) and a higher TNM stage (OR: 3.35, 95%CI: 2.20–5.09, P<0.001).…”
-
798
-
799
-
800