Search alternatives:
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
Showing 781 - 800 results of 44,452 for search '(( a ((teer decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( i ((largest decrease) OR (larger decrease)) ))', query time: 0.74s Refine Results
  1. 781
  2. 782

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  3. 783

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  4. 784

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  5. 785

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  6. 786

    Low concentrations of siRNA TMPRSS2-ERG III and IV impair TMPRSS2-ERG oncogene and oncoprotein levels but not cell viability. by Giorgia Urbinati (554921)

    Published 2015
    “…One hundred percent cell viability corresponds to the number of living cells incubated with transfecting agent only. Results are the mean ± SD of two independent experiments containing 8 replicates for each condition. * = <i>p</i><0.05, ** = <i>p</i><0.01, *** = <i>p</i><0.001, significant decrease compared to untreated cells (TA) or to siRNA Control (Kruskal & Wallis followed by Tukey and Dunnet test).…”
  7. 787

    S1 Raw Images - by Jimin Yoon (9646685)

    Published 2022
    Subjects:
  8. 788
  9. 789
  10. 790
  11. 791

    Effects of siRNA TMPRSS2-ERG on ERG protein expression and cell viability. by Giorgia Urbinati (554921)

    Published 2015
    “…<p>VCaP cells were transfected for 24h, 48h and 72h with 50 nM of siRNAs TMPRSS2-ERG III (1, 2, 3), siRNAs TMPRSS2-ERG IV (1, 2), siRNA against ERG wild type or siRNA Control. <b>a. Western blot analysis:</b> the expression of ERG protein detected by Western blot showed the effects of siRNAs against TMPRSS2-ERG, ERG wild type or siRNA Control. …”
  12. 792
  13. 793
  14. 794

    Fig 1 - by Xiaohua Zhuang (11890694)

    Published 2021
    Subjects:
  15. 795

    S1 Data - by Xiaohua Zhuang (11890694)

    Published 2021
    Subjects:
  16. 796
  17. 797

    The Prognostic Value of Decreased LKB1 in Solid Tumors: A Meta-Analysis by Jian Xiao (253329)

    Published 2016
    “…Additionally, the pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated that decreased LKB1 was associated with larger tumor size (OR: 1.60, 95%CI: 1.09–2.36, P = 0.017), lymph node metastasis (OR: 2.41, 95%CI: 1.53–3.78, P<0.001) and a higher TNM stage (OR: 3.35, 95%CI: 2.20–5.09, P<0.001).…”
  18. 798
  19. 799
  20. 800