Showing 131,321 - 131,340 results of 134,256 for search '(( a d decrease ) OR ( 5 ((step decrease) OR (((mean decrease) OR (a decrease)))) ))', query time: 2.10s Refine Results
  1. 131321
  2. 131322
  3. 131323

    Table1_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  4. 131324

    Table2_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  5. 131325

    Table4_Association between OPG polymorphisms and osteoporosis risk: An updated meta-analysis.docx by Xu Han (141301)

    Published 2022
    “…At the same time, the OPG G1181C polymorphism reduces the risk of osteoporosis (C vs G: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.74–0.95; CC vs GG: OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60–0.93; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67–0.95; CC vs GG + GC: OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.70–1.00). Moreover, a significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis was also discovered in Asian (C vs G: OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98; CC vs GG: OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.47–0.95; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.58–0.95) and the female (C vs G: OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.75–0.97; CC vs GG: OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.61–0.96; GC + CC vs GG: OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66–0.95). …”
  6. 131326
  7. 131327
  8. 131328
  9. 131329
  10. 131330
  11. 131331
  12. 131332
  13. 131333
  14. 131334
  15. 131335
  16. 131336

    Image_1_Combination of Fe(OH)3 modified diatomaceous earth and qPCR for the enrichment and detection of African swine fever virus in water.TIF by Hao Wu (65943)

    Published 2022
    “…A high adsorption rate of about 99.99 (±0.01)% and a high recovery rate of 64.01 (±10.20)% to 179.65 (±25.53)% was achieved by using 1g modified diatomaceous earth for 10 L ASFV contaminated water. …”
  17. 131337

    Image_2_Combination of Fe(OH)3 modified diatomaceous earth and qPCR for the enrichment and detection of African swine fever virus in water.TIF by Hao Wu (65943)

    Published 2022
    “…A high adsorption rate of about 99.99 (±0.01)% and a high recovery rate of 64.01 (±10.20)% to 179.65 (±25.53)% was achieved by using 1g modified diatomaceous earth for 10 L ASFV contaminated water. …”
  18. 131338
  19. 131339

    Response of duck breeders to dietary L-Carnitine supplementation during summer season by YASSER S. RIZK (7528694)

    Published 2019
    “…<div><p>Abstract: A total number of 300 (225 ducks and 75 drakes) Sudani ducks, 28-wk-old were divided into five groups to investigate the effects of dietary L-carnitine (LC) supplementation on productive, hatching and physiological performance as well as nutrients digestibility coefficients. …”
  20. 131340

    Supplementary material- Sources of zinc by Ramya Lekha Medida (11205873)

    Published 2023
    “…The objective of this study was to identify intestinal epithelial responses to different Zn sources. Forty-five pigs (nine per treatment) were fed a corn-soybean meal diet without supplemented Zn (ZnR) or supplemented with 50 and 100 ppm of inorganic ZnCl2 (Zn50 and Zn100), and amino acid-bound organic Zn sources (LQ50 and LQ100). …”