Search alternatives:
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
de decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a de » _ de (Expand Search), a d (Expand Search), i de (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
de decrease » we decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a de » _ de (Expand Search), a d (Expand Search), i de (Expand Search)
-
1641
(A) Decreased DNA CpG methylation at the CpG island of the gene locus in Th2 cells
Published 2011“…MeDIP assay was performed using an anti–5-methyl cytidine antibody (5-meC) and a control antibody (Cont.). …”
-
1642
-
1643
-
1644
Decreased remyelination initiation is observed in Scribble cKO mice following focal demyelination in corpus callosum.
Published 2015“…In the contralateral (unlesioned) hemisphere (CL), no difference was seen in the proportion of axons in the corpus callosum that were myelinated in Scribble cKO compared to wild-type animals (A–C). Fewer remyelinated axons were observed in corpus callosum in the lesion area in Scribble cKO mice (E) relative to controls (D) as quantified in F; 0.4–0.5 μm: WT = 80.0% ± 9.8%, cKO = 41.3% ± 8.9% myelinated; 0.5–0.6 μm: WT = 79.4% ± 6.3%, cKO = 41.5% ± 9.5% myelinated; 0.6–0.7 μm: WT = 91.6% ± 3.0%, cKO = 44.3% ± 8.7% myelinated; >0.7 μm: WT = 92.7% ± 1.9%, cKO = 47.9% ± 2.5% myelinated. …”
-
1645
-
1646
-
1647
-
1648
-
1649
-
1650
-
1651
-
1652
-
1653
-
1654
CC genotype of rs7120118 variation associates with decreased soluble Aβ42 levels in the temporal cortex.
Published 2013“…(B) Aβ42-ELISA demonstrates a significant decrease in the soluble Aβ42 levels in the temporal cortex of patients with CC genotype as compared to the TT genotype (*p<0.05, ANOVA LSD, n = 33/34/16, rs7120118 genotypes TT/CT/CC, respectively). …”
-
1655
-
1656
-
1657
-
1658
-
1659
-
1660