Search alternatives:
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
e decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
18181
Evaluating competitive inhibition by gcn5-F221A using a synthetic pPHO5-yECitrine construct.
Published 2012“…Increasing expression of <i>gcn5-F221A</i> resulted in decreased mean fluorescence. …”
-
18182
-
18183
-
18184
Radiation induces early alterations in NMDAR phosphorylation and internalization of NR1 and NR2A subunits.
Published 2013“…<p>(A) Immunoprecipitation of NR2A subunits and semi-quantitative western blotting analysis of NR2A expression and phospho-tyrosine performed on dentate samples collected 30 minutes following a dose of 10 Gy radiation revealed diminished tyrosine phosphorylation. (76.7±4.9% of control, *p = 0.005, n = 7, data presented as mean ± s.e.m.) …”
-
18185
Data Sheet 1_Honeysuckle extracts as a potential inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>In this study, post-treatment with HSE resulted in dose-dependent decreases in both the RNA levels and TCID<sub>50</sub> of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero E6 cells; treatment with 50 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml alcohol HSEs achieved up to 95.323% and 92.587% inhibition, respectively. …”
-
18186
Sensitivity analysis reveals a unique contribution for all damage mechanisms, but simulated tissue is most sensitive to oxygen.
Published 2015“…Each column represents a value of pressure cycle length. As the cycle length increases, the number of reperfusion events decreases for the same period of ischemia. …”
-
18187
Ablation study results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18188
LSDED structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18189
SSFF and TFE structural diagrams.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18190
Comparison of key data before and after pruning.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18191
5-fold cross-validation comparison results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18192
Improved structure of YOLO11.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18193
3-D comparison of key data across models.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18194
Shape-IoU structure diagram.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18195
YOLO11 structure.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18196
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18197
Comparative experimental results.
Published 2025“…The experimental results show that the model before pruning has 96.1% and 53.2% mean average precision mAP50 and mAP50:95, respectively, which are 11.9% and 11.1% higher than the original YOLO11n, and the model after pruning also has 10.8% and 9.3% higher than the original YOLO11n, respectively, and the number of parameters is reduced to 279,778, and model size is reduced to 1.3MB. …”
-
18198
-
18199
-
18200