Showing 1,041 - 1,060 results of 78,305 for search '(( a e decrease ) OR ( 50 ((((ms decrease) OR (a decrease))) OR (nn decrease)) ))', query time: 1.32s Refine Results
  1. 1041
  2. 1042
  3. 1043
  4. 1044
  5. 1045
  6. 1046
  7. 1047

    POm E-stimulation before whisker stimulus does not decrease cortical response magnitude and duration when AGA is applied in L1. by Carlos Castejon (2182382)

    Published 2016
    “…<p>(A) Percentage change in mean response magnitude by POm E-stimulation before (black) and after AGA application (grey). …”
  8. 1048

    POm E-stimulation before whisker stimulus does not decrease cortical response magnitude and duration when PTX is applied in L1. by Carlos Castejon (2182382)

    Published 2016
    “…<p>(A) Percentage change in mean response magnitude by POm E-stimulation before (black) and after PTX application (grey). …”
  9. 1049
  10. 1050

    C2GnT1 gene knock-down results in decreased binding of cells to E-selectin. by Catherine A. St. Hill (357388)

    Published 2013
    “…<p>(A) Significant differences in E-selectin binding were not observed among LS174T un-manipulated cells, cells transduced with scrambled shRNA, or with C2GnT1 shRNA by flow cytometry. …”
  11. 1051

    Substitution of a lysine residue at position 8 of two model 9mer H2-K<sup>b</sup> epitope precursors leads to a marked decrease of N-terminus trimming by ERAP1 <i>in vitro</i>. by Irini Evnouchidou (375919)

    Published 2013
    “…<p><i>Panels </i><i>A</i><i> and </i><i>B</i>, peptides LSIINFEKL and the variant LSIINFEAL (both at 50 µM) were incubated with 7.8 nM of ERAP1 for 1 hr at 37°C and the products analyzed by RP-HPLC. …”
  12. 1052
  13. 1053
  14. 1054
  15. 1055
  16. 1056
  17. 1057

    The schematic diagram of the SD decrease and CNR increase rates by 50% ASiR and MBIR (compared with those by FBP). by Peigang Ning (541890)

    Published 2014
    “…<p>As the mA value decreased, MBIR brought about gradually augmented variations in the two parameters, whereas 50% ASiR did not give rise to noticeable variations.…”
  18. 1058
  19. 1059
  20. 1060

    Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area [33]. by Katie Frerker (680803)

    Published 2014
    “…</p><p>Species that significantly increased (“Winners”) or decreased (“Losers”) in abundance over the past 50+ years in the study area <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0115843#pone.0115843-Wiegmann1" target="_blank">[33]</a>.…”