Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,555 for search '(( a large decrease ) OR ((( six ((n decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( a marker decrease ))))', query time: 0.66s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    Image 7_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  3. 3

    Image 6_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  4. 4

    Image 3_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  5. 5

    Image 1_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  6. 6

    Image 2_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  7. 7

    Image 4_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  8. 8

    Image 5_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  9. 9

    Image 8_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Results<p>In total, 15 types of decreased autoantibodies were identified, and 6 of them were constructed into a predictive model for early lung cancer, reaching a sensitivity of 76.19% and a specificity of 55.74%. …”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

    Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas by Malena Sibaja Leyton (18400983)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">#METADATA</p><p dir="ltr">#'data.frame': 472 obs. of 28 variables:</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ ID: Factor variable; a unique identity for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Year: Factor variable; six factors available (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021) representing the year for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually lost</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually alive</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Education: Factor variable; four factors are available ("Self-taught","Learned from another melip","Intro training","Formal tech training"), representing the training level in meliponiculture</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Operation_Size: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies managed by the participant (in n)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propAgri: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of agricultural area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propForest: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of forested area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_annual: Numeric variable; representing the average annual temperature (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_annual_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Oct_March_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Apri_Sept_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Oct_March: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Apri_Sept: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Importance_dead: Factor variable; three factors are available Normal","High","Very high"), representing the perception of the significance of annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Climatic_environmental: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered climatic and environmental problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Contamination: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered contamination problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Nutritional: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered nutritional problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Sanitary: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered sanitary problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Queen: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered queen problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Time: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Economic: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered economic problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Attacks: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time attacks as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Swarming: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered swarming problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p><br></p>…”
  14. 14
  15. 15

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20