Showing 1 - 20 results of 3,914 for search '(( a larger decrease ) OR ((( 6 ((we decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( _ largest decrease ))))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Biases in larger populations. by Sander W. Keemink (21253563)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>(<b>A</b>) Maximum absolute bias vs the number of neurons in the population for the Bayesian decoder. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Overview of the WeARTolerance program. by Ana Beato (20489933)

    Published 2024
    “…This research evaluates the "WeARTolerance’’ arts-based program in reducing mental health stigma among diverse youths. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Image 6_Exploration of the diagnostic and prognostic roles of decreased autoantibodies in lung cancer.tif by Ying Ye (72583)

    Published 2025
    “…</p>Methods<p>In this study, we applied the HuProt array and the bioinformatics analysis to assess the diagnostic values of the decreased autoantibodies in lung cancers.…”
  17. 17

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  18. 18

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  19. 19

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  20. 20