Search alternatives:
latency decreased » rate decreased (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
late decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
a latency » _ latency (Expand Search), c latency (Expand Search), se latency (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
latency decreased » rate decreased (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search)
late decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search)
a latency » _ latency (Expand Search), c latency (Expand Search), se latency (Expand Search)
a large » _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Effects of increasing amounts of gravel on escape latency and aversiveness of gravel.
Published 2025“…<p>(A) Escape latency during trial 1 was higher when greater amounts of gravel were in the connecting chamber. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Regionally distinguished demographic estimates for GI-1d-a based on dataset A (all sites).
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
Comparison of Final Palaeolithic Core Areas (based on data A) from GI-1d-a to GS-1.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
Regionally distinguished demographic estimates for GS-1 based on dataset A.
Published 2025Subjects: -
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Effects of contralateral noise on CAEP (Lee et al., 2025)
Published 2025“…The presentation of contralateral noise had a significant effect on P1 and N1 latencies, both of which decreased. …”
-
19
-
20
Effects of increasing gravel on initial escape latency in non-injured <i>vs.</i>
Published 2025“…</b> However latency was significantly decrease for the 40 g condition in the injured day 0 animals. **** indicates significant differences across increasing amounts of gravel (p < 0.0001). * indicates a post-hoc test confirming a significant difference between injured and non-injured animals 40 g (p < 0.05).…”