Showing 1 - 20 results of 8,023 for search '(( a marker decrease ) OR ((( a web decrease ) OR ( a ((linear decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))))', query time: 0.54s Refine Results
  1. 1

    A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Linear regression analysis. by Young Kyu Lee (14076058)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p> Conclusion </p><p>The HTRT group showed a greater decrease in HU both pre- and post-treatment, indicating a possible indirect marker of tumor necrosis. …”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

    Effects of GJE extract treatment decreased expression of NF-kB p65. by Natnicha Suttawong (22367172)

    Published 2025
    “…Data are expressed as mean ± SD, error bars indicate standard deviation, n = 6/group. a: when compared to the control group. b: when compared to the NF group, <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.05 for both a and b.…”
  7. 7
  8. 8

    S2 File - Factors influencing effective decrease of controlled attenuation parameters in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease: A multilevel linear regression analysis at Vajira Hospital by Sonsawan Sangprasert (22772538)

    Published 2025
    “…S2 File - <p>Factors influencing effective decrease of controlled attenuation parameters in metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease: A multilevel linear regression analysis at Vajira Hospital</p>…”
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  13. 13

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  14. 14

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  15. 15

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20