Search alternatives:
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
latest decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
n decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
a latest » a latent (Expand Search), _ latest (Expand Search), _ latent (Expand Search)
marker decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked increase (Expand Search)
latest decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), greatest decrease (Expand Search), largest decreases (Expand Search)
n decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a marker » _ marker (Expand Search), _ markers (Expand Search)
a latest » a latent (Expand Search), _ latest (Expand Search), _ latent (Expand Search)
-
1
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
2
-
3
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
4
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
5
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
6
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
7
-
8
KAP assessment scores (n = 422).
Published 2025“…The baseline mean knowledge level score was 9.5 (38.0%) and rose to 21.08 (84.3%) p = 0.000 immediate post-health education and a 2.1% decrease 20.54 (82.2%) p<0.001 at week six from the immediate post health education score. …”
-
9
-
10
-
11
Mammary fistula (n(%)).
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>We found that numerical rating scale(NRS) score and incidence of breast fistula in group A were significantly lower than other, the continuous decrease of postoperative drainage in group A was higher than other, there were significant differences among groups (p<0.001). …”
-
12
-
13
A flow diagram of the study entry.
Published 2025“…Cluster analysis classified 4 clusters of decline in food intake changes during the last 6 months before death: immediate decrease (n = 14); decrease from 1 month before death (n = 24); decrease from 3 months before death (n = 7); and gradual decrease for 6 months before death (n = 24).…”
-
14
Open data.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Objective</p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the evolution of bone mass in exclusive breastfeeding mothers (EBF) for 6 months, and another cohort, who had also exclusively breastfed their children while concomitantly donating breast milk for 6 months (EBF+), with evaluation of their bone mass during the subsequent 6-month period of complementary breastfeeding.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A group of exclusive breastfeeding mothers (n = 38) were evaluated at 15 days and six months postpartum, and a second group of EBF-donors (EBF+) (n = 39) were evaluated at six months and one year postpartum. …”
-
15
Data from: Colony losses of stingless bees increase in agricultural areas, but decrease in forested areas
Published 2025“…</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">#METADATA</p><p dir="ltr">#'data.frame': 472 obs. of 28 variables:</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ ID: Factor variable; a unique identity for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Year: Factor variable; six factors available (2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021) representing the year for the response to the survey</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually lost</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_annual: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies annually alive</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_dry: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the dry season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ N_dead_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies lost during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr">#$ N_alive_rainy: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies alive during the rainy season</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Education: Factor variable; four factors are available ("Self-taught","Learned from another melip","Intro training","Formal tech training"), representing the training level in meliponiculture</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Operation_Size: Numeric variable; representing the number of colonies managed by the participant (in n)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propAgri: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of agricultural area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ propForest: Numeric variable; representing the percentage of forested area surrounding the meliponary (in %)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_annual: Numeric variable; representing the average annual temperature (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_annual_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Oct_March_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ precip_Apri_Sept_sum: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in mm)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Oct_March: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between October to March (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr">#$ temp.avg_Apri_Sept: Numeric variable; representing the total accumulated precipitation between April to September (in ºC)</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Importance_dead: Factor variable; three factors are available Normal","High","Very high"), representing the perception of the significance of annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Climatic_environmental: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered climatic and environmental problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Contamination: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered contamination problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr"> #$ Nutritional: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered nutritional problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Sanitary: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered sanitary problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Queen: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered queen problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Time: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Economic: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered economic problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Attacks: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered time attacks as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p dir="ltr">#$ Swarming: Binary variable; representing if the participant considered swarming problems as a potential driver (1) or not (0) of their annual colony losses</p><p><br></p>…”
-
16
Table 1_Imeglimin may affect hemoglobin A1c accuracy via prolongation of erythrocyte lifespan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from the INFINITY clinical trial.d...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>The change in hemoglobin concentration at 6 months was not statistically significant (mean ± SD: −0.2 ± 0.9 g/dL; p = 0.23). While HbA1c and GA decreased and 1,5-AG increased one month after imeglimin initiation, GA and 1,5-AG showed rapid changes compared to the gradual decrease in HbA1c. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Relationship between the Gender Representation Disparity Index (GRDI) and average explicit sex markers in film criticism, illustrating a decrease in markers as the GRDI moves toward a female-dominated cast.
Published 2025“…<p>Relationship between the Gender Representation Disparity Index (GRDI) and average explicit sex markers in film criticism, illustrating a decrease in markers as the GRDI moves toward a female-dominated cast.…”
-
20