Changes in baseline T-cell activation markers through week 12 and week 24 according to the linear regression model. a. by Tosi M. Mwakyandile (16408705)

HSF2 reduced the decrease in the MMP in Caco-2 cells, which were observed by laser confocal microscopy. by Wen Wang (6570)

“…Red fluorescence indicated that there was no obvious abnormality in the MMP, while green fluorescence represented a decrease in the MMP. B: Statistical bar chart of the ratio of red to green fluorescence, <i>P</i> value of less than 0.05 was identified as* and <i>P</i> value of less than 0.01 was identified as**. …”

The linearly decreasing convergence factor a. by Junhao Wei (6816803)

Macrophage-specific IGF-1 overexpression decreases plaque MMP8 and. by Patricia Snarski (22305205)

A summary of the included study characteristics. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

Linear regression analysis. by Young Kyu Lee (14076058)

“…</p><p> Conclusion </p><p>The HTRT group showed a greater decrease in HU both pre- and post-treatment, indicating a possible indirect marker of tumor necrosis. …”

Changes in baseline T-cell exhaustion, monocyte activation and platelet activation markers through week 12 and week 24 according to the linear regression model. a. by Tosi M. Mwakyandile (16408705)

Overview of the six original ACTIV-3/TICO trials. by Elizabeth S. Munroe (21568166)

Results of Multiple Linear Regression. by Benjamin S. Killen (22766029)

“…Forty-six individuals with mobility deficits undergoing outpatient physical therapy completed the 10-meter walk test in clinic and walked over six standardized terrains (e.g., pavers, gravel, sand). …”

Table_2_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in infants—a pilot observational study.XLSX by Sara Gonia (14132166)

“…Probiotic use has been proposed as a strategy to promote health via modulation of microbiomes. …”

Table_1_Maternal oral probiotic use is associated with decreased breastmilk inflammatory markers, infant fecal microbiome variation, and altered recognition memory responses in infants—a pilot observational study.XLSX by Sara Gonia (14132166)

“…Probiotic use has been proposed as a strategy to promote health via modulation of microbiomes. …”

Effects of bevacizumab addition on VEGF-A concentrations <i>in vitro</i>. by Masashi Okawa (8951294)

Subjects:

PDRN decreases the expression of cellular aging markers. by Jingjing Chen (293564)

PMC exhibits less sensitivity to decreasing signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by Owen Puls (22340344)

Processing of wakefulness and sleep EEG data to calculate the HFD in a representative subject. by Francesco Colussi (22421582)

Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW. by Mieke L. M. Bentvelzen (21594442)

List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”

List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

“…The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”