Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
i larger » _ larger (Expand Search), i large (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
a larger » a large (Expand Search), _ larger (Expand Search), _ large (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
-
1
The introduction of mutualisms into assembled communities increases their connectance and complexity while decreasing their richness.
Published 2025“…Parameter values: interaction strengths were drawn from a half-normal distribution of zero mean and a standard deviation of 0.2, and strength for consumers was made no larger than the strength for resources. …”
-
2
Biases in larger populations.
Published 2025“…With width scaling this was achieving by narrowing the tuning curves. Threshold parameter <i>c</i> = − 0 . 1 for the rectified cosine tuning with 4 neurons, and width <i>w</i> was 1 for von Mises tuning. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The stress-deformation model of the single uncoupled joint (g-λ model with λ ≥ 1) is employed to depict the nonlinearity of uncoupled joints, with a greater value of the parameter λ signifying a lower degree of non-linearity in the joint model curve. …”
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
<b>Supporting data for manuscript</b> "<b>Voluntary locomotion induces an early and remote hemodynamic decrease in the large cerebral veins</b>"
Published 2025“…The locomotion values (traces and metrics) are in arbitrary units with larger integers representing a greater displacement of the spherical treadmill, the hemodynamic (Hbt) values (traces and metrics) are a percentage change from the normalised baseline (prior to stimulus presentation), and the corresponding time series vector is presented in seconds. …”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Modelled policy outcomes, with posterior values for individual nodes ranked from 1-5 across the parties - Green, Reform UK, Liberal Democrat, Conservative, and Labour, where 1 is the lowest rank and 5 is the highest. The parties are ranked for each policy node in the network (e.g., income tax), based on the direction of change (“performance indicator”) stated in the first column (e.g., lowest, highest, most, improvement). For example, a value of 5 for Green tax means that green tax is lowest under Reform UK’s policies, while a value of 1 means that green tax is highest under the Green Party’s policies. Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).
Published 2025“…Larger text in bold and italic font indicates that the directional change (i.e., increase or decrease) of a node under a party’s policies is consistent with the direction indicated, whereas black text indicates an opposite directional change (e.g., income tax is predicted to decrease under Reform UK in alignment with the performance indicator, and increase under Green and Labour).…”