Showing 1,601 - 1,620 results of 119,701 for search '(( a mean decrease ) OR ( 5 ((((step decrease) OR (we decrease))) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.78s Refine Results
  1. 1601
  2. 1602
  3. 1603
  4. 1604
  5. 1605
  6. 1606
  7. 1607
  8. 1608

    List of Included studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  9. 1609

    The search strategy in three databases. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  10. 1610

    NIH score. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  11. 1611

    List of excluded studies. by Zahra Tajik (20752452)

    Published 2025
    “…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
  12. 1612

    Example of skyline query for proteins. by Rizka Fatriani (17485787)

    Published 2024
    “…The stability of the protein-ligand complex resulting from docking was examined using molecular dynamics simulations, and we observed the best average root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.99 Å for PPARG with trans-3-indoleacrylic acid, which was lower than with the native ligand BRL (2.02 Å). …”
  13. 1613

    Top 10 pathways with the lowest p-value. by Rizka Fatriani (17485787)

    Published 2024
    “…The stability of the protein-ligand complex resulting from docking was examined using molecular dynamics simulations, and we observed the best average root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.99 Å for PPARG with trans-3-indoleacrylic acid, which was lower than with the native ligand BRL (2.02 Å). …”
  14. 1614

    Pseudocode of block-nested loop (BNL). by Rizka Fatriani (17485787)

    Published 2024
    “…The stability of the protein-ligand complex resulting from docking was examined using molecular dynamics simulations, and we observed the best average root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.99 Å for PPARG with trans-3-indoleacrylic acid, which was lower than with the native ligand BRL (2.02 Å). …”
  15. 1615

    Top 10 gene ontologies with the lowest p-value. by Rizka Fatriani (17485787)

    Published 2024
    “…The stability of the protein-ligand complex resulting from docking was examined using molecular dynamics simulations, and we observed the best average root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.99 Å for PPARG with trans-3-indoleacrylic acid, which was lower than with the native ligand BRL (2.02 Å). …”
  16. 1616
  17. 1617
  18. 1618
  19. 1619
  20. 1620