Search alternatives:
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
-
1401
-
1402
Mean scores and 95% CIs according to SARS-CoV-2 infection status and work-related determinants.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1403
Image5_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.TIF
Published 2021“…Bacterial counts were analyzed using standard mean difference (SMD) and by a random effects model with the DerSimonian–Laird estimation.…”
-
1404
Table5_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.DOCX
Published 2021“…Bacterial counts were analyzed using standard mean difference (SMD) and by a random effects model with the DerSimonian–Laird estimation.…”
-
1405
Table5_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.DOCX
Published 2021“…Bacterial counts were analyzed using standard mean difference (SMD) and by a random effects model with the DerSimonian–Laird estimation.…”
-
1406
Image5_Orally Administered Probiotics Decrease Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans but Not Other Periodontal Pathogenic Bacteria Counts in the Oral Cavity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.TIF
Published 2021“…Bacterial counts were analyzed using standard mean difference (SMD) and by a random effects model with the DerSimonian–Laird estimation.…”
-
1407
-
1408
-
1409
-
1410
-
1411
-
1412
-
1413
-
1414
-
1415
-
1416
-
1417
-
1418
The wound healing microenvironment restored GJIC but did not directly decrease tumor cells.
Published 2015“…(B and C) The combination of three compounds led to angiogenesis and optimal fibroblast proliferation but did not directly decrease A549 cancer cells. The results are presented as mean±SE (n = 5/group) **<i>p</i> < 0.01 <i>vs</i> control group.…”
-
1419
-
1420