Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search)
a mean » _ mean (Expand Search)
-
1
Variable importance plot (mean decrease accuracy and mean decrease Gini).
Published 2020“…The variables are presented from descending importance. The mean decrease in Gini coefficient is a measure of how each variable contributes to the homogeneity of the nodes and leaves in the resulting random forest. …”
-
2
-
3
TMD residues decrease sensitivity.
Published 2017“…Glu residues are color coded based upon effect, with residues in red producing a significant decrease in pH<sub>50</sub>, and in yellow, an insignificant or weak effect, whereas the dark purple and magenta for His residues are synonymous to the red of Glu residues. …”
-
4
Comparison of mean differences in temperature decreases.
Published 2022“…Acetaminophen was associated with a steeper and more prolonged temperature decrease than dipyrone.…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
Mean change in incidence and diagnoses if testing rates decrease.
Published 2013“…<p>Change in incidence (A) and diagnoses (B) if testing rates decrease by 30% and 50% relative to the current testing rate.…”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
nLTD decreases the molecular proximity between endogenous spine cofilin and F-actin
Published 2014“…Data are expressed as mean ± SEM of the “% FRET” values determined using the Zeiss LSM 510 software module for FRET acceptor photobleaching (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0094787#s2" target="_blank">Methods</a>); *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared to control alone; <sup>#</sup>p<0.05 compared to nLTD alone; <sup>XX</sup>p<0.01 compared to CIN alone, two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post hoc test., (number of spines: ctrl = 43, nLTD = 29, CIN = 49, CIN+nLTD = 77). …”
-
20