Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a non » _ non (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
ng decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a non » _ non (Expand Search)
-
301
-
302
-
303
-
304
Exposure to EtBr decreases mtRNA in rat striatal co-cultures, purified neuronal cultures, and astrocytes.
Published 2017“…Error bars reflect delta-method propagated +/-SEM, with level of significance determined following Dunn’s post-hoc test. 2D[<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190456#pone.0190456.ref005" target="_blank">5</a>] = 5ng/ml EtBr for 2 days, 4D[<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190456#pone.0190456.ref005" target="_blank">5</a>] = 5ng/ml EtBr for 4 days, 2D[<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190456#pone.0190456.ref050" target="_blank">50</a>] = 50ng/ml EtBr for 2 days, 4D[<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0190456#pone.0190456.ref050" target="_blank">50</a>] = 50ng/ml EtBr for 4 days. …”
-
305
-
306
-
307
-
308
An association between decreasing incidence of invasive non-typhoidal salmonellosis and increased use of antiretroviral therapy, Gauteng Province, South Africa, 2003–2013
Published 2017“…</p><p>Results</p><p>From 2003–2013, the incidence of iNTS per 100,000 population per year decreased from 5.0 to 2.2 (p < .001). From 2004 to 2013, the incidence per 100,000 population of HIV viral load testing increased from 75.2 to 3,620.3 (p < .001). …”
-
309
-
310
-
311
Dose-dependent increase in NREM sleep and decrease in wakefulness by <i>p</i>.<i>o</i>. administration of TEG in mice.
Published 2017“…<p>(A, B) Typical examples of EEG delta power (0.5–4 Hz), EMG integral, and hypnograms of a mouse after <i>p</i>.…”
-
312
-
313
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
314
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
315
NIH score.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
316
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…There is no significant difference one month after NSPT in diabetic patients (SMD: -5.83, 95%CI: -15.5, 3.83, p = 0.237, I-square, 97.4%, random effects model, n = 2), but three (SMD: -2.44, 95%CI: -3.37, -1.15, p = 0.001, I-square, 75.9%, random effects model, n = 3) and six months (SMD: -2.41, 95%CI: -3.81, -1.01, p = 0.001, I-square, 78.7%, random effects model, n = 2) after the treatment, a significant decrease is observed in the mean GCF visfatin level. …”
-
317
-
318
-
319
-
320